Did I just read NCAA players can now fair catch kickoffs for a touchback???????????

[Earnest T. Bass]

You’re mentally deficient.

Some ****** in shorts pops up a pooch kick, what exactly does that prove, or how does that refute anything I said relating to an ACTUAL GAME.

Show me footage of onsides kicks from actual games, genius. 99.99999% are bouncers. The small percentage that are pooched rarely, if ever go high enough for even a chance for a fair catch, they almost always hit the ground very quickly.

What in holy fūck are you trying to prove?

How stupid you are?

Here's another video that proves what an insufferable moron you are...you claim this never happens so just to educate you the kicking team plays on the college level known as 'Alabama' the receiving team, also a reasonably well known college team, is known as Clemson...you may want to Google those names to give yourself an idea as to who they are:

 

[ICANEDOIT]

Can I still fair catch if it touches the ground first aNd I am not in the end zone? Do I get the ball at the 25? If not, maybe that is a good strategy for the kicking team.

 

[rccollins]

This new rule will not change the rare occcuraences that a player would call a fair catch on a short pop up onside. They always could fair catch that. This rule is just trying to encourage teams to fair catch it if they catch it between the end zone and he 25. Side note: why do people call message boards- blogs? It's not a blog.

 

[Mnhurricane]

This would have helped our sorry *** KR team last year. Felt like more than a few times teams were trying to sky the kickoff to around the 5 or so knowing our KR team was allergic to blocking anybody

 

[Calinative]

If we're being honest College Football should not have a kickoff. I think its something crazy like 50% of all concussion happen on Kickoff/Kick Return. Way more than even Punt/Punt return. They should just start at the 25 after scores. These kids aren't being payed to risk their mental health. If the NFL wants to keep KO/KOR in the game, then whatever they pay their players.

But in college the KO should be eliminated

 

[Calinative]

Can I still fair catch if it touches the ground first aNd I am not in the end zone? Do I get the ball at the 25? If not, maybe that is a good strategy for the kicking team.

Once the ball touches the ground it can not be fair caught.
Onside kicks must travel 10 yards AND touch the ground or opposing player to be live. The kicking team can not just kick it super high but only 20 yards away, run under it and catch it, because its not a live ball.

Secondly this rule is that Any fair catch from the 25 to the back of the endzone results in a touchback. This has absolutely no effect on fair catching pop up kicks that get caught at the 30 or something. When that happens you get the ball where you faircaught it. So essentially this means ANY TIME a kick off is fair cuaght it will be placed Minimum of the 25.

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

Here's another video that proves what an insufferable moron you are...you claim this never happens so just to educate you the kicking team plays on the college level known as 'Alabama' the receiving team, also a reasonably well known college team, is known as Clemson...you may want to Google those names to give yourself an idea as to who they are:

Good god.

You have mental problems.

What does this prove? You found 2 little pooch kicks out of thousands of kickoffs. What is it your trying to prove?

We’ve all seen hundreds, maybe thousands of onsides kicks. The vast majority, DON’T WORK, most are bouncers, and actual pooched up ones that spend any significant time in the air are super rare as fūck. And anybody that watches football knows that. But apparently you don’t get that.

 

[SayWhat]

It's a rule to try and help with player safety and will put an even sort of puts a damper on kickoffs IMHO.

 

[Earnest T. Bass]

Good god.

You have mental problems.

What does this prove? You found 2 little pooch kicks out of thousands of kickoffs. What is it your trying to prove?

We’ve all seen hundreds, maybe thousands of onsides kicks. The vast majority, DON’T WORK, most are bouncers, and actual pooched up ones that spend any significant time in the air are super rare as fūck. And anybody that watches football knows that. But apparently you don’t get that.

You're a liar and fraud!

The question was asked by another poster: “Why you would want to fair catch a kickoff is the real question?”

I responded: “Onside Kick”

Your snide, asinine, dim-witted, witless, imbecilic and clueless response to my comment was: “LOL - no. Onside kick is a live ball bouncing on the ground. It has to be played. Jesus.”

As proven above, your total lack of football knowledge had you claiming that an onside kick only bounces along the ground, when anyone with a thin slice of football knowledge knows that there are times that an onside kick is popped up and does not roll along the ground (proven by the videos I posted that you claimed didn’t exist—are you ever right about anything?). Your words: "Show me footage of onsides kicks from actual games, genius."

Your childish and as usual, uninformed comment had NOTHING to do with the statistics as to how many onside kicks travel along the ground versus those that are popped up. You claimed that onside kicks only roll along the ground. But, you being a known liar are now trying to mislead others who read your crapola as to what you originally claimed.

You are a troll and have no life. There’s not a day that passes that you are not haranguing, insulting and admonishing posters on this site for something they’ve posted. You believe you are the thought police and anyone that dares to have a differing view than you means they are stupid. This is a trait of many low IQ'ers.

Now run along little girl, because as usual you are boring me with your lies, lack of knowledge and stunted intellect.

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

Here’s how stupid you are.

It doesn’t even apply.

This rule is about balls kicked off and fair caught inside the 25.

Onside kicks, the very tiny infinitesimally tiny fraction that are pooched up and stay up in the air for more than a second, could already be fair caught and downed anyway. Or just caught and a knee taken.

What in the holy fūck are you arguing about.

Listen to yourself, you imbecile.

When is the last time you’ve even seen a fair fūcking catch on an onsides kick? Maybe it’s happened a couple of times in the last twenty years. Who even knows.

“Why you would want to fair catch a kickoff is the real question?”

You responded: “Onside Kick””

Good question. Your answer is still retarded. Onside kick. LMFAOOOOO.

My god.

 

[Dwinstitles]

in 20 years it will be two hand touch, and boxers wont be able to punch people in the face cuz cte

 

[Earnest T. Bass]

Once again little girl, you lie, my recent posts are copies and pastes of your exact comments, but now you are trying to change what was being discussed and are failingly trying to create another narrative to cover-up your one of a kind stupidity.

What offends me the most? Not your bankrupt knowledge of football! Not your constant trolling! Not your habitual lying. But, the fact you are so intellectually stunted, along with being the world's worst liar makes conversing with you similar to putting a computer in front of an Indonesian Orangutan and then reading his work after he's fingered the keys.

At least have the decency to go back and edit your previous posts so we can pretend that you are not the dumbest living thing on this planet, if not in the Universe.

 

[Bird4um]

Those are usually on big returns though. I too don't like the constant sissification of the kicking aspect of the game but I don't think you'll see too many returners utilizing this. I think most of those guys relish the opportunity to catch a short kick at the 10.

I don't think this will be up to the returner....Coach will call the shot!!

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

Once again little girl, you lie, my recent posts are copies and pastes of your exact comments, but now you are trying to change what was being discussed and are failing trying to create another narrative to cover-up your one of a kind stupidity.

What offends me the most? Not your bankrupt knowledge of football! Not your constant trolling! Not your habitual lying. But, the fact you are so intellectually stunted, along with being the world's worst liar makes conversing with you similar to putting a computer in front of an Indonesian Orangutan and then reading his work after he's fingered the keys.

At least have the decency to go back and edit your previous posts so we can pretend that you are not the dumbest living thing on this planet, if not in the Universe.

Why you would want to fair catch a kickoff is the real question.

Onside kick...

LMFAOOOOO

.

 

[Earnest T. Bass]

LMFAOOOOO

.

"In the first place, God made idiots. That was for practice. Then he made you!"

It should amaze me that you would re-post comments that prove what a simmering moron you are, but the entertainment I enjoy from knowing you don't have a clue when you are reinforcing that infamous stupidity of yours is priceless. Thank you, little girl!

Also, when you post "LMFAOOOOO" it's like telling a joke to an audience then having to explain why it's funny, when of course it is not...just Dumb! Now that's funny!

 

[DCane]

Here’s how stupid you are.

It doesn’t even apply.

This rule is about balls kicked off and fair caught inside the 25.

Onside kicks, the very tiny infinitesimally tiny fraction that are pooched up and stay up in the air for more than a second, could already be fair caught and downed anyway. Or just caught and a knee taken.

What in the holy fūck are you arguing about.

Listen to yourself, you imbecile.

When is the last time you’ve even seen a fair fūcking catch on an onsides kick? Maybe it’s happened a couple of times in the last twenty years. Who even knows.

“Why you would want to fair catch a kickoff is the real question?”

You responded: “Onside Kick””

Good question. Your answer is still retarded. Onside kick. LMFAOOOOO.

My god.

Admittedly this isn't my fight, but this argument has to be one of the silliest things I've ever seen posted on here. In both videos, there's no receiver in the area to even call for a fair catch, hence why the kicking team was able to recover. It's such an unexpected way to take an onside kick that it just happened to work.

Even with this new rule, those two plays in the video would still work. There has to be a receiver under the ball ready to make a catch in order for a fair catch signal to be used. You can't just call it whenever the ball is in the air and you have no chance at it, otherwise every team would just call it whenever they wanted.

OG you've more than proven you point, don't bother with this guy, he's just not getting it.

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

Admittedly this isn't my fight, but this argument has to be one of the silliest things I've ever seen posted on here. In both videos, there's no receiver in the area to even call for a fair catch, hence why the kicking team was able to recover. It's such an unexpected way to take an onside kick that it just happened to work.

Even with this new rule, those two plays in the video would still work. There has to be a receiver under the ball ready to make a catch in order for a fair catch signal to be used. You can't just call it whenever the ball is in the air and you have no chance at it, otherwise every team would just call it whenever they wanted.

OG you've more than proven you point, don't bother with this guy, he's just not getting it.

He just doesn’t get why his answer is dumb.

Bizzare.

 

[Earnest T. Bass]

Admittedly this isn't my fight, but this argument has to be one of the silliest things I've ever seen posted on here. In both videos, there's no receiver in the area to even call for a fair catch, hence why the kicking team was able to recover. It's such an unexpected way to take an onside kick that it just happened to work.

Even with this new rule, those two plays in the video would still work. There has to be a receiver under the ball ready to make a catch in order for a fair catch signal to be used. You can't just call it whenever the ball is in the air and you have no chance at it, otherwise every team would just call it whenever they wanted.

OG you've more than proven you point, don't bother with this guy, he's just not getting it.

Your missing the point...the reason that teams try to pop a kick up is to have it land in an area that they believe to be an open or uncovered area of the field. Obviously, if there is no player in the area he's not going to be able to call for a fair catch. The fair catch on that type of play comes into use when a player is in the general area so he can protect himself as he awaits for the kick to come down, thus he doesn't fumble the ball or get his head knocked off. I just can't believe I'm having to explain this...

PS: That clown "OG" started all of this when he claimed that onside kicks only roll on the ground. Are you making the same claim?

 

[Earnest T. Bass]

He just doesn’t get why his answer is dumb.

Bizzare.

Now you’re lying to that poster…

So, this started with you claiming that onside kicks only roll on the ground and therefore cannot be captured by employing a fair catch. When I pointed out that onside kicks are popped up from time to time (like in the Alabama/Clemson National Championship game) you claimed that it doesn’t happen and no videos exist to prove this to be true. When I posted several videos of college teams that had in fact used that type of onside kick you then shifted to the defense that it doesn’t happen 99.999% of the time. Of course, that just another easily disproved lie.

Now your mommy should have taught you this, little girl, when you tell one lie then that requires another lie and another lie and so on. Instead of you admitting your mistake you opted to try and lie your way out of your stupid, arrogant, childish comments, which is something you do on a regular basis on this site and I am sure in your daily life.

When you read this section be sure to be standing in front of a mirror. A Pathological liar is the most difficult individual to communicate with. Simply because, you can't take anything they say at face value. You don't know what's real and what's not, due to the fact they reach a point in their sad lives where they don’t know when they are lying or telling the truth. Now look into the mirror!

For me, this experience/interactions reminds me how one (me) can fake throwing a ball, and a dog (you being the dog) will chase after what he believes to be a thrown ball. Not all dogs fall for this stunt…only the stupid ones. Do you see where I am going with this? No, that would be asking too much from you…little girl!

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]