forums

Dan Enos

Advertisement
305to954 said:
Bruh🤣🤣..what’s the Maryland HC is who was killing it at Bama? No OCs offense gonna look good without a good Oline..but a spread offense would surely give us 35-40 points a game every week
Click to expand...
You still don't get it do you? You still don't understand what some of us mean by going to a spread offense. I will try to explain it again.

The argument here is not about this season necessarily. Everyone of us knows that when your offensive line is this terrible that changing scheme will not be the panacea that cures all of our problems. The reason being is that we have a serious coaching problem. This is a terribly coached team in every sense of the term. Having said that, I strongly believe that with a better OL coach and a better all around staff that this OL wouldn't be this bad.

What we are trying to say is that this program is a natural fit for a spread offense based on the type of players that we have and the type of athletes that we have the best access to. Being in Miami, there is never a shortage of fast and explosive skill players. As a program however, we do not have easy access to dominant offensive linemen like Ohio State, Alabama and Oklahoma have. At least not for the time being. Having acknowledged that it is clear to see that our identity on offense should be something that maximizes our strengths while at the same time mitigating our weaknesses. Based on the natural recruiting resources available our identity on offense should be a wide open uptempo shotgun based offense that is predicated on getting the ball to our many playmakers in space. Like @Liberty City El says "Pace and Space". We should use the strengths we have to put as much pressure on the defense as possible. This is not to say that we ignore the running game but schematically and philosophically we should pass to set up the run not visa versa. We should use a potent passing attack and use the running game as a changeup to the passing game. We are not in position to line up in tight formations roll our sleeves up and blow people off the ball. We don't have the offensive line to do that right now.

So we are saying that we should play to our strengths and build our identity off of that. The kids in our local recruiting area would love to see UM running that type of offense and it would attract more and more talent. The irony of this is that if we commit to the identity I have outlined above with a good coaching staff, it will produce wins and build excitement for the program and that in turn will allow us to start successfully recruiting more elite offensive linemen and that in turn will make us a better program.
 
MizCane said:
Enos is a good QB coach. Both QBs fundamentals and play is much better. Not sure if it’s bc he’s such a good QB coach ot it’s bc Jon Richt was so under qualified anyone would have made these guys better.

Play caller/offense needs a lot of work. Could work better with a dominant Oline.

Oline is young and not talented which will hinder a lot of schemes.
Click to expand...
I see the same Perry I saw last year. Jarren is the check down king. Wont even give Martell a look. Not sold on Enos making QB;s play under center especially with this O line. The game is not played center in todays football. What happened to all the motion that was going to fool everybody and Miami would be scoring at will?
 
MizCane said:
Enos is a good QB coach. Both QBs fundamentals and play is much better. Not sure if it’s bc he’s such a good QB coach ot it’s bc Jon Richt was so under qualified anyone would have made these guys better.

Play caller/offense needs a lot of work. Could work better with a dominant Oline.

Oline is young and not talented which will hinder a lot of schemes.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Very good QB coach. Not good schematically with the X’ & O’s play calling. Mike Loc deserves a bunch of credit for Bama’s offensive success. Enos would have done fine at Bama with what they have there and would have had ppl fooled. Give credit to Saban for knowing who he really was..
 
ZuCrew said:
Agreed. Very good QB coach. Not good schematically with the X’ & O’s play calling. Mike Loc deserves a bunch of credit for Bama’s offensive success. Enos would have done fine at Bama with what they have there and would have had ppl fooled. Give credit to Saban for knowing who he really was..
Click to expand...


Anybody would seem like a good OC with that 6 star talent at Bama. Good lord.
 
mdpcane said:
"hinder the scheme" ? if thats what you call playing like ****t and stinking up the stadium, then yes, the OL is hindering the scheme ... LOL
Click to expand...
FrancisSaywer said:
You still don't get it do you? You still don't understand what some of us mean by going to a spread offense. I will try to explain it again.

The argument here is not about this season necessarily. Everyone of us knows that when your offensive line is this terrible that changing scheme will not be the panacea that cures all of our problems. The reason being is that we have a serious coaching problem. This is a terribly coached team in every sense of the term. Having said that, I strongly believe that with a better OL coach and a better all around staff that this OL wouldn't be this bad.

What we are trying to say is that this program is a natural fit for a spread offense based on the type of players that we have and the type of athletes that we have the best access to. Being in Miami, there is never a shortage of fast and explosive skill players. As a program however, we do not have easy access to dominant offensive linemen like Ohio State, Alabama and Oklahoma have. At least not for the time being. Having acknowledged that it is clear to see that our identity on offense should be something that maximizes our strengths while at the same time mitigating our weaknesses. Based on the natural recruiting resources available our identity on offense should be a wide open uptempo shotgun based offense that is predicated on getting the ball to our many playmakers in space. Like @Liberty City El says "Pace and Space". We should use the strengths we have to put as much pressure on the defense as possible. This is not to say that we ignore the running game but schematically and philosophically we should pass to set up the run not visa versa. We should use a potent passing attack and use the running game as a changeup to the passing game. We are not in position to line up in tight formations roll our sleeves up and blow people off the ball. We don't have the offensive line to do that right now.

So we are saying that we should play to our strengths and build our identity off of that. The kids in our local recruiting area would love to see UM running that type of offense and it would attract more and more talent. The irony of this is that if we commit to the identity I have outlined above with a good coaching staff, it will produce wins and build excitement for the program and that in turn will allow us to start successfully recruiting more elite offensive linemen and that in turn will make us a better program.
Click to expand...
okay..I still don’t believe that full heartedly. Even before Enos got here I’d rather a multiple attack. Which means you can still run spread concepts, west coast concepts in the passing game. Why? Because I believe in using multiple personnel. That’s just my preference. Idc what we run. It could be the wing t for all I care if we moving the ball.

now for us, I dont agree with the assessment going spread would fix our problem problems long term unless we get the oline fixed. getting it fixed means competing at a top 10-5 level annually

I have seen multiple ppl say well look at LSU. First LSU has 4 legit first day NFL WRs right now. From what I’ve seen LSU has not gone full spread. They’ve just worked more n more from the gun and have instilled a lot of tempo. Still implementing a power run game, RPO and PA. BUT for them, just like Bama it all starts up front and their WR have been winning one Vs ones constantly. Then ppl mention Bama, same thing. Just cause it’s out of the gun doesn’t mean it’s full on spread. When I look at those teams I would still consider those offenses Multiple. Rather if you see them throwing the ball more at bama and now LSU, and want to therefore say they are now “spread offenses” is a mute point. The thing both the systems have in place is elite level oline play rn

Like I said before the true spread teams that have won titles are Clemson and Auburn, also UF with Tebow.

Our issues rn are far more than running a spread or not. Whatever system you run needs a offensive line in order to win at a elite level. As much as teams try and cloak average talent upfront when you get to the elite level of comp, the top 10 matchups it still comes down to who can control the LOS...just as examples down below look at the difference in oline splits between spread teams.
 

Attachments

  • 915D9B53-06E9-4952-9E18-D0AC0F85803E.webp
    915D9B53-06E9-4952-9E18-D0AC0F85803E.webp
    105 KB · Views: 12
  • 10EFE547-5A7B-4730-B2BF-33B4BA942F78.webp
    10EFE547-5A7B-4730-B2BF-33B4BA942F78.webp
    53.2 KB · Views: 11
  • AD54A616-0230-4A79-B739-EEC591F04D14.webp
    AD54A616-0230-4A79-B739-EEC591F04D14.webp
    26.7 KB · Views: 11
  • 9DD12CA9-E723-4B9A-8659-CC924190F08A.webp
    9DD12CA9-E723-4B9A-8659-CC924190F08A.webp
    30.8 KB · Views: 12
MizCane said:
If Manny is coming back I wouldn’t mind Enos get his chance as well. I think what he wants for run can work well with an improved line.
Baker is over his head though.
ST needs a dedicated coach. New blood whether it’s Patkes fault or not. He can’t be retained.
Click to expand...
There’s zero excuse to be under center with the athletes we have and this day in age of football unless you run the triple option or have Wisconsin’s line.
 
Advertisement
luciano.8 said:
There’s zero excuse to be under center with the athletes we have and this day in age of football unless you run the triple option or have Wisconsin’s line.
Click to expand...
Who would u say our best player is..or biggest matchup..I would, as would most say it’s Brevin Jordan...and being under center has nothing to do with negating your athleticism’ on the outside lol ..that’s another CIS myth
 
305to954 said:
Who would u say our best player is..or biggest matchup..I would, as would most say it’s Brevin Jordan...and being under center has nothing to do with negating your athleticism’ on the outside lol ..that’s another CIS myth
Click to expand...

with the line we have there is zero excuse to have slow developing plays under center. Some plays are fine but spread the **** field. Look at all of the top performing programs year in and year out. What do they do? Spread the field and get their playmakers in space. Make it easier on the line and QB.
 
luciano.8 said:
with the line we have there is zero excuse to have slow developing plays under center. Some plays are fine but spread the **** field. Look at all of the top performing programs year in and year out. What do they do? Spread the field and get their playmakers in space. Make it easier on the line and QB.
Click to expand...
At what point will y’all realize this offense of personnel ain’t all that..under center, in shotgun doesn’t matter. This oline has look just as ok the guy as it has under center
 
He only lasts one year in most of his roles, so
I honestly expected him to leave after this year no matter how it turned out (good, great, bad, awful, indifferent).
 
BooBoo said:
He seems to outsmart himself. Against Georgia Tech he just would not commit to the run. It is not against the law to run two consecutive runs. Plus where is Will Mallory? Asking him to just block, which is his weakness is hurting his confidence. Flex him out at WR. I agree he has greatly improved our QB room.
Click to expand...

Was wondering the same about Mallory. Seems tailored made for those imaginative end zone fades we run when double reverses from the 10 yd line are not working in our red zone offense.
 
Interesting little note -- CIS's lord and savior Rapist Jr. has FSU averaging less YPP against P5 competition than Miami (we're ranked 32nd, they're ranked 58) and is outscoring Miami's 23.8 PPG against P5 competition by only a point.

Keep thinking we're a spread system away from glory CIS...
 
Advertisement
streetja said:
Interesting little note -- CIS's lord and savior Rapist Jr. has FSU averaging less YPP against P5 competition than Miami (we're ranked 32nd, they're ranked 58) and is outscoring Miami's 23.8 PPG against P5 competition by only a point.

Keep thinking we're a spread system away from glory CIS...
Click to expand...
Nobody said glory but it would definitely improve this offense a ton. And fsu isnt that good at wr and te.
 
Ecush said:
This piece of human trash has done this every step of his career. Collect a check as a failure until you are on the brink of getting fired and then take another job.
Click to expand...
And it's always been a demotion, until Manny comes along.
 
Torocane said:
Problem is manny will hire the next OC...so expect the same
Click to expand...

Exactly! What decent OC would want to work for Manny? The OL is weak, recruits are fleeing, Manny’s been exposed, and he’s about to get fired. AND the entire athletic department prioritizes PC culture over winning.

Burn it all down and start over.
 
Back
Top