forums

Corey Hetherman

Suhrthing said:
I Dont Believe You Will Ferrell GIF
Click to expand...
The beauty of it all is you don’t have to haha…now make sure you clock out of that warehouse so you can get paid to cover the hole these holidays put you in.
 
Advertisement
BigBucksNoWhammies said:
The beauty of it all is you don’t have to haha…now make sure you clock out of that warehouse so you can get paid to cover the hole these holidays put you in.
Click to expand...
What’s wrong with warehouse work?

Seriously asking? I mean we get it…you MIGHT have money. But in reality you are just the same as anyone else on here posting with the exception of a few who actually have intel about what this site is.

Also, 9/10 people like you look like that Joe Camel dude who has to buy chicks and they even make it obvious they hate you even while you fork out your cash.

You could always prove it and I’ll say I’m wrong, but post a photo of your mansion with you in it 3 fingers up German style to shut everyone up.

Or else pipe down phaggot.
 
Donny Donowitz said:
What’s wrong with warehouse work?

Seriously asking? I mean we get it…you MIGHT have money. But in reality you are just the same as anyone else on here posting with the exception of a few who actually have intel about what this site is.

Also, 9/10 people like you look like that Joe Camel dude who has to buy chicks and they even make it obvious they hate you even while you fork out your cash.

You could always prove it and I’ll say I’m wrong, but post a photo of your mansion with you in it 3 fingers up German style to shut everyone up.

Or else pipe down phaggot.
Click to expand...
I didn’t make it about money, the poster I was going back and forward with did…money not **** but a tool, don’t make a man. If I wasn’t married I’ll ask you to put that Joe Camel talk to the test with your woman haha. And I don’t knock how nobody earns a living but if you take shots, prepare for some back. Phaggot? Lol that warehouse comment triggered you, apologies…get back on that forklift bum lolllll
 
currycane said:
Heatherman has a rare talent who squeezes the best out of his players and takes their game to the next level. This D is getting nastier as the season moves forward. Heatherman embodies old school Miami defense.

I think these same talented players with D'onofrio would not get these incredible results.
Click to expand...
When Josh Pate and Colin Cowherd see the speed and comment on the VIOLENCE
To
Me, that says it all…..the culture he’s creating on D is SPOT ON for Miami hurricane football
Pay the Man!!!!
 
His situational awareness for certain downs and distance is elite. Elite coaching to play the pass at the end of the game knowing they couldn’t afford a qb run that would run into a tfl.
 
Advertisement
Wonder what his dream job is? BC… Rutgers? He could/should wait it out here for the can’t miss opportunity.

He stays here another 2 years… increase his recruiting footprint in SFL, the trajectory for him would be sky high.

I’ve always found coaches who played on one side of the ball but built their coaching specialty on the other side interesting. Seems they see things/prepare differently than others. Hetherman being a former college QB has to be super helpful when scheming. Same as Urban Meyer being a former DB becoming an offensive minded coach.
 
BigBucksNoWhammies said:
All of this because I mentioned some things I didn’t agree with in a DC’s scheme…never change CIS.
Click to expand...
I think your initial point was that you were surprised the defense hasn't gotten exposed because of how simple it is - specifically playing spot drop vs match in zone? Why would it be better for this defense to play match vs spot in zone?

We've limited explosive plays given up relative to last year. Do you disagree that playing spot drop vs match has helped in that regard?

We are top-20 in takeaways/gm, sacks/gm, and TFLs/gm. As long as we tackle well past the sticks (which we usually do), bending a bit on defense doesn't concern me.

Earlier in the year we were bad at stopping teams from scoring TDs when they got in the red zone (gave up nearly 6 points per drive on those first 7 games), but since then we have given up less than 3 points per drive when the defense has bent enough that the opponent scrimmages in the red zone (and we are also giving up fewer red zone drives per game). We give up more yards than other very good defenses, but we are elite at limiting points.

I thought McElroy was spot on when he said our defense is more about players than plays early in the A&M broadcast. We've got a bunch of guys who are going to be NFL players playing on our defense this year. The scheme is pretty simple, they rarely get tricked, the communication is great, they play fast, and create a lot of havoc.

Maybe it's not sustainable without similar elite pro-ready talent, but we don't know that Hetherman would have the same defensive plan in future years.
 
Advertisement
flips said:
I think your initial point was that you were surprised the defense hasn't gotten exposed because of how simple it is - specifically playing spot drop vs match in zone? Why would it be better for this defense to play match vs spot in zone?

We've limited explosive plays given up relative to last year. Do you disagree that playing spot drop vs match has helped in that regard?

We are top-20 in takeaways/gm, sacks/gm, and TFLs/gm. As long as we tackle well past the sticks (which we usually do), bending a bit on defense doesn't concern me.

Earlier in the year we were bad at stopping teams from scoring TDs when they got in the red zone (gave up nearly 6 points per drive on those first 7 games), but since then we have given up less than 3 points per drive when the defense has bent enough that the opponent scrimmages in the red zone (and we are also giving up fewer red zone drives per game). We give up more yards than other very good defenses, but we are elite at limiting points.

I thought McElroy was spot on when he said our defense is more about players than plays early in the A&M broadcast. We've got a bunch of guys who are going to be NFL players playing on our defense this year. The scheme is pretty simple, they rarely get tricked, the communication is great, they play fast, and create a lot of havoc.

Maybe it's not sustainable without similar elite pro-ready talent, but we don't know that Hetherman would have the same defensive plan in future years.
Click to expand...
Being simple is fine, actually prefer it so guys can play fast. I’m just a big believer in matching routes, especially if playing C3….even on Fitzgerald’s first pick, from what I remember that WR was open but Reed missed badly(thanks Reed)…if playing match 3, the backside hook defender would have been looking to match that.

But if you have a DL like we have, I guess you can get away with the spot drop lol.
 
BigBucksNoWhammies said:
I didn’t make it about money, the poster I was going back and forward with did…money not **** but a tool, don’t make a man. If I wasn’t married I’ll ask you to put that Joe Camel talk to the test with your woman haha. And I don’t knock how nobody earns a living but if you take shots, prepare for some back. Phaggot? Lol that warehouse comment triggered you, apologies…get back on that forklift bum lolllll
Click to expand...
Nah, I’ve ran a few warehouses and there are a lot of good people doing that job. You have slick fingers…guaranteed they wouldn’t back it up in person. You almost were a good person here and got an apology from me, but I can see you’re too weak of man for that.

My woman isn’t measuring stick my dude, just like money isn’t. I’m on 24 acres living out tranquility, but don’t get it twisted..I’ll put you at the bottom of my pond.
 
Back
Top