- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 54,321
Well D$ has reliable information and just this week he said that facilities have gone way down the priority list and that NIL is a lot more important.
Here we go again. "So-and-so said such-and-such, yada yada yada".
For the millionth time....this is NOT "one or the other".
"The priority list" is based on a lot of other issues, including other construction projects going on in close proximity. Why do people have to be such soft-shouldered simps when it comes to this issue.
Name ONE OTHER building project at UM that has ever been completed within 2-3 years of announcement. I'll wait. I'm fascinated. I can't name a single one in the last 40 years.
We are just about to start working on "the facilities". Some of them. Not all of them. So let's not generalize, and let's not base all of our thoughts on something DMoney said, which may have been intentionally vague and/or misinterpreted by the masses.
Since nearly the beginning, I've said that an aggressive timeline would be difficult, given the much higher priority on the dorms. But, hey, what does a UM alum with 3 degrees know about UM's construction priorities?