I wrote they were taken as a prerequisite then described Maryland as a rival; with rival being an adjective.
ESPN IN 2012
Prerequisite: necessary condition;
a thing that is required as a PRIOR CONDITION for SOMETHING ELSE to happen or exist.
Come on,
@cookies, for just ONCE in your life, be honest. For once in your life, admit that you made a mistake. For once in your life, take responsibility for your ****porsting.
I'm trying to do you a favor here.
Here is exactly what you wrote:
To be brought in "as a prerequisite" to "get their rival Maryland" is a lie. It's just that, a falsehood. A lie which you continue to spin into some sort of different statement that you never made in the first place.
Now you're going to bull**** us by telling us that "rival" was an adjective? Yes, it COULD be used that way, but that's not how you used it. "Their rival". That usage IS A NOUN.
Stop trying to gaslight us all. You screwed up. There is no need for you to go insane by posting a bunch of extraneous links to other articles. Don't highlight certain words and make them 72 pt. font, particularly when they are different words from what people took issue with.
You tried to bull**** us by telling us that Rutgers was taken "as a prerequisite to get their rival Maryland", and that statement is just not true. In fact, in one of the craziest and funniest goofs you've ever committed to writing, you posted an article that says
MARYLAND WAS THE PREREQUISITE TO RUTGERS GETTING A BID. So you actually contradict yourself, and you did it to yourself, without anyone else doing it to you.
Look, you don't have to like me. I don't care about that. But I take care in what I post, I don't post a bunch of bull**** and then try to gaslight people into believing that I never made a misstatement. Here's the reality, I have almost 57,000 posts on this board, and every once in a while, I make a mistake. It's rare, but it happens. And if someone calls me on it, I'm a man and I freely admit that I made an error in posting.
But not you. Noooo, not precious
@cookies .
Look, man, here's the reality. People on this board have come to realize that when they read a
@cookies post, they'd better check the math. You can't trust the source on a
@cookies post, not without double-checking.
I don't give a **** if we ever agree on anything, I just got tired of reading all your inaccurate posts, and I called you out a couple of times. There's an easy fix for that. Check yourself. Before you wreck yourself.
And posting another goofy
@cookies meme isn't going to fix your nonsense. Only you can fix your own nonsense. Because you **** sure won't listen to anyone else who corrects your misstatements.
