RoboCane
ACC = 💩
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2015
- Messages
- 629
Probably the wisest words in here. Let it be a motivator to not let it happen again.The opinions will be split 50-50 on that call. Best to just move on and get ready for Cal. Ignore the noise.
Probably the wisest words in here. Let it be a motivator to not let it happen again.The opinions will be split 50-50 on that call. Best to just move on and get ready for Cal. Ignore the noise.
He didn't have complete control. Ball clearly is moving around while he went downDid all you folks on Suckeyestreit's jock just hear him saying the VT receiver had possession?
F Suckeyestreit
Thanks for the correction; Satan can return to his level in Dante's Inferno, especially because now he is an expert on the Commerce Clause.they were talking about the holding penalty on VT that had their 55 yard td run called back
I truly don't understand the claim that there wasn't enough evidence to overturn, and not just as a homer. There were two angles where the ball was visible in replay. The first was the initial catch attempt, and in that one there were arms of 2 VT receivers and 1 Miami defender and the two receivers both had contact with the ball and were trying to pull it down but it was sliding down along their arms, in no way secured. The other review angle as everyone was coming to the ground shows the ball moving around. The definition of a catch requires that the ball is secured, which it wasn't. It also requires that security is maintained through contact with the ground, and it wasn't.Can suck a giant **** this morning.
Doing everything to say we were gifted the win.
Didn't show the 2 17s...
Didn't show the bad holding call that called off our TD
Focused on the bad holding call that took the rushing TD from VT
Then said no way that the final catch should be over turned.
Was it out best showing, **** no. Did we deserve the win...who knows?
But there were bad calls going both ways and they only focused on the ones that benefitted Miami
I need someone to explain this to me. I'm not sure if it was a UM player or a Hokie but one of them had their butt hit out while having a hand on the ball. Does that blow the play dead?Idk how any fan of football that knows the rules could think that was a catch. You have to maintain possession which clearly he did not.
Meh, he can say whatever he wants, he did his job when he got the Admins to wake up and treat the football team seriously again.Did all you folks on Suckeyestreit's jock just hear him saying the VT receiver had possession?
F Suckeyestreit
Brady Quinn on Big Noon stated he knew it wasn’t a catch and not exactly a Miami PartisanI truly don't understand the claim that there wasn't enough evidence to overturn, and not just as a homer. There were two angles where the ball was visible in replay. The first was the initial catch attempt, and in that one there were arms of 2 VT receivers and 1 Miami defender and the two receivers both had contact with the ball and were trying to pull it down but it was sliding down along their arms, in no way secured. The other review angle as everyone was coming to the ground shows the ball moving around. The definition of a catch requires that the ball is secured, which it wasn't. It also requires that security is maintained through contact with the ground, and it wasn't.
Inject the hate into my veins.Can suck a giant **** this morning.
Doing everything to say we were gifted the win.
Didn't show the 2 17s...
Didn't show the bad holding call that called off our TD
Focused on the bad holding call that took the rushing TD from VT
Then said no way that the final catch should be over turned.
Was it out best showing, **** no. Did we deserve the win...who knows?
But there were bad calls going both ways and they only focused on the ones that benefitted Miami
No, embrace the haTe- I don’t give a ****.The opinions will be split 50-50 on that call. Best to just move on and get ready for Cal. Ignore the noise.
the fox kickoff show was like idk how they even called it a TD to begin with. thats the biggest issue with this. they should have never called it a TD and the call is fine. it seemed that the refs didnt know what to call but knew it was gonna get reviewed anyways so one jackass just raised his arms and said TDYes. After being unbiased and going back and looking. There were probably 15-20 bad calls/missed calls for both teams. 4 of them that point implications.
That **** at the end was fitting for a terrible ******* crew.