College Football News ranks Canes class #3 w/ transfers

ghost2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
3,839
Its interesting that they list Jeff Thomas as part of this class.
It is interesting. I can see why they did, but it does beg the follow-up question of - should you factor convincing transfers/draft prospects coming back to school into "recruiting" rankings?
 

umhurricane2511

Always Faithful
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
7,846
It is interesting. I can see why they did, but it does beg the follow-up question of - should you factor convincing transfers/draft prospects coming back to school into "recruiting" rankings?
To be honest, who cares?
Recruiting "rankings" are for the fans anyways.
Coaches don't care if they're "ranked" #2, #4, #9, etc. They know if they made their football team better.

All the other crap is just for message boards and media outlets to talk about.
 

ghost2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
3,839
To be honest, who cares?
Recruiting "rankings" are for the fans anyways.
Coaches don't care if they're "ranked" #2, #4, #9, etc. They know if they made their football team better.

All the other crap is just for message boards and media outlets to talk about.
Oh no doubt. Just a semantic exercise.
 

TrueFloridian

Sophomore
Joined
Sep 23, 2013
Messages
2,194
To be honest, who cares?
Recruiting "rankings" are for the fans anyways.
Coaches don't care if they're "ranked" #2, #4, #9, etc. They know if they made their football team better.

All the other crap is just for message boards and media outlets to talk about.
That's not true. Several coaching contracts include bonuses to coaches when they land a top 15 or top 10 class according to Rivals or 247 composite.
 

avax

Recruit
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Messages
784
Top