Coach Macho got band?

[Rellyrell]

First Juwon, then AQM and Grace now Coach Macho...all b4 the season starts???!

 

[Core Values]

Is Chad Wilson's thread still up here? That was funny

very entertaining

One of my all time favorite threads

 

[rmcid]

Coach gave up the guy's name. They HAD to ban him. Also, posted a picture of the guy. There are actually laws against that.

Seems to me that the guy was 'besting' the Coach and the Coach resorted to nefarious tactics.

Cite please. That statement smells like utter ******* *********

74% of statements like that are made up.

 

[rmcid]

Seemed like a guy and I liked reading his posts.

He was definitely a guy.

That's racist.

 

[Stingarov]

Coach Macho was undone by his passion and fiery spirit. **** shame. Here's to hoping CIS welcomes him back shortly.

This.

 

[Cane Dynasty]

He posted the dude's name and pics of him.

Is that in fact against site rules?

Where exactly are the rules as well? I've never seen them and would like to read them for my own personal protection.

It's been "stickied" to the first post of the forum for like 2 years now.

It says nothing about giving someones name or porsting a pic of them.

When you get 2 infractions for posting personal information then that should be your clue to stop or face a 7 day ban.

I can understand that, but along the same lines....If it is in fact against the rules then it should be listed with the rules right?

Or is there a double secret rules list?

 

[BigDikCane]

That was one funny *** thread tho

 

[Pearson704]

banned*

:q3XKXeX:

Why would someone down-vote this? I haven't read this for a day because I thought someone posted about dude starting his own band. Use the internet and the edit feature folks.

 

[Pearson704]

CoRch Macho coached a team that lost to McArthur. That tells you all you need to know about his football acumen.

slow down on the Mac playboy.

 

[Pearson704]

Who gets Band next?

I think the correct grammar is 'who gets [A] band next?"

 

[Pearson704]

Lol I'm trying to figure out who has more fan boys on this site [MENTION=5124]Coach Macho[/MENTION] or [MENTION=4841]The Franchise[/MENTION] ?? Lol **** is hilarious

All fanboys down-vote, now.

:q3XKXeX:

 

[plantcity3]

Dam, DS got the hammer too huh?.?....He rustled alot of feathers but their is some truth to alot of things he would post...

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[Calinative]

Is that in fact against site rules?

Where exactly are the rules as well? I've never seen them and would like to read them for my own personal protection.

It's been "stickied" to the first post of the forum for like 2 years now.

It says nothing about giving someones name or porsting a pic of them.

When you get 2 infractions for posting personal information then that should be your clue to stop or face a 7 day ban.

I can understand that, but along the same lines....If it is in fact against the rules then it should be listed with the rules right?

Or is there a double secret rules list?

Yeah, stop being a little *****.
If you dont act like an idiot you wont get banned.

 

[Cane Dynasty]

It's been "stickied" to the first post of the forum for like 2 years now.

It says nothing about giving someones name or porsting a pic of them.

When you get 2 infractions for posting personal information then that should be your clue to stop or face a 7 day ban.

I can understand that, but along the same lines....If it is in fact against the rules then it should be listed with the rules right?

Or is there a double secret rules list?

Yeah, stop being a little *****.
If you dont act like an idiot you wont get banned.

So this is a classic example of a personal attack. If I report the post I am quoting does that porster get an infraction?
[MENTION=2]DMoney[/MENTION] [MENTION=1]Andrew[/MENTION]

 

[Andrew]

It says nothing about giving someones name or porsting a pic of them.

When you get 2 infractions for posting personal information then that should be your clue to stop or face a 7 day ban.

I can understand that, but along the same lines....If it is in fact against the rules then it should be listed with the rules right?

Or is there a double secret rules list?

Yeah, stop being a little *****.
If you dont act like an idiot you wont get banned.

So this is a classic example of a personal attack. If I report the post I am quoting does that porster get an infraction?
@DMoney @Andrew

He got an warning which is wan infraction worth 0 points. You are getting an infraction for trolling.

Edit: I gave you warning instead since you already had 2 points against you and the 3rd would get you banned. I would be careful if I were you.

 

[Cane Dynasty]

When you get 2 infractions for posting personal information then that should be your clue to stop or face a 7 day ban.

I can understand that, but along the same lines....If it is in fact against the rules then it should be listed with the rules right?

Or is there a double secret rules list?

Yeah, stop being a little *****.
If you dont act like an idiot you wont get banned.

So this is a classic example of a personal attack. If I report the post I am quoting does that porster get an infraction?
@DMoney @Andrew

He got an warning which is wan infraction worth 0 points. You are getting an infraction for trolling.

Edit: I gave you warning instead since you already had 2 points against you and the 3rd would get you banned. I would be careful if I were you.

I'm not trolling. I'm just trying to find out exactly what the rules are. It seems like there are different rules for different mods.

I am honestly just trying to find out exactly what is what.

 

[Calinative]

It says nothing about giving someones name or porsting a pic of them.

When you get 2 infractions for posting personal information then that should be your clue to stop or face a 7 day ban.

I can understand that, but along the same lines....If it is in fact against the rules then it should be listed with the rules right?

Or is there a double secret rules list?

Yeah, stop being a little *****.
If you dont act like an idiot you wont get banned.

So this is a classic example of a personal attack. If I report the post I am quoting does that porster get an infraction?
[MENTION=2]DMoney[/MENTION] [MENTION=1]Andrew[/MENTION]

He got an warning which is wan infraction worth 0 points. You are getting an infraction for trolling.

The **** am I getting a warning for?
He asked what the double secret rule is, and I told him it's not being a ***** and not being an idiot. That is an objective statement.
Why am I at fault because he thinks I'm attacking him?

 

[Geo305]

Bring back macho

 

[Canemang]

Bring back macho

Said no one ever

 

[Ibis Wingz]

These site has gone too soft since [MENTION=5124]Coach Macho[/MENTION] was Band. We need a shot of machismo. Bring back [MENTION=5124]Coach Macho[/MENTION]!