chrisRMNU
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
- Messages
- 1,748
As I’m sure many of you, I was heavily critical of Mario’s decision to not attempt moving the ball for a possible game winning FG at the end of the game Saturday. However, I realized that they may be alternate, and logical reasons why he didn’t.
We possessed the ball for over 13 minutes in the 4th quarter, and that Clemson defense was beginning to buckle while ours was well rested. It’s entirely possible that Mario understood this and instead of putting the ball in the air with a very green QB, he decided they had a better chance of winning within the confines of CFB overtime rules, which puts the ball on the +25 to start each drive.
It certainly seemed like Miami was the team with a little more gas left in the tank in the OT period, and thankfully it worked out. Now… I would still have tried to end the game in regulation if it were me, however I can see the other side of it.
We possessed the ball for over 13 minutes in the 4th quarter, and that Clemson defense was beginning to buckle while ours was well rested. It’s entirely possible that Mario understood this and instead of putting the ball in the air with a very green QB, he decided they had a better chance of winning within the confines of CFB overtime rules, which puts the ball on the +25 to start each drive.
It certainly seemed like Miami was the team with a little more gas left in the tank in the OT period, and thankfully it worked out. Now… I would still have tried to end the game in regulation if it were me, however I can see the other side of it.