CIS Staff Predictions: Miami vs. Texas A&M

Trinton Breeze

Senior
Premium
Joined
Aug 21, 2024
Messages
2,578
Confidence is strong around the CIS staff heading into Miami’s first-round trip to Kyle Field. Nearly everyone is rolling with the Hurricanes, trusting Miami to handle business even in one of the toughest road environments in college football.

The lone holdout is me. I’m siding with Texas A&M, mainly because Kyle Field is no joke and I think the atmosphere plays a huge role in this one.

Bottom line: CIS leans Miami, with just one staffer backing the Aggies.

IMG_0620.jpeg

Continue reading...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0620.jpeg
    IMG_0620.jpeg
    400.2 KB · Views: 0
Advertisement
On paper we're very closely matched at an aggregate level.

MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
  • Wide Receiver (Miami .9252, Texas A&M .8952)
  • Running Back (Miami .9064, Texas A&M .8854)
  • Quarterback (Miami .9062, Texas A&M .8878)
  • Defensive End (Miami .9301, Texas A&M .8963)
  • Linebacker (Miami .9002, Texas A&M .8952)
  • Safety (Miami .8960, Pittsburgh .8665)
  • Cornerback (Miami .9083, Pittsburgh .8639)
TEXAS A&M POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
  • Tight Ends (Texas A&M .8925, Miami .8846)
  • Offensive Line (Texas A&M .9074, Miami .8922)
  • Defensive Tackle (Texas A&M .9240, Miami .9213)
  • Safety (Texas A&M .9189, Miami .8960)
  • Cornerback (Texas A&M .9260, Miami .9160)
  • Special Teams (Texas A&M .7499, Miami .6999)

The Aggies are the second most talented team on paper that we've faced this season after Notre Dame:

2025 SCHEDULE OPPOSITION COMPOSITE
  • .9012 - Notre Dame (1.61 avg CFB experience)
  • .8446 - South Florida (1.91 avg CFB experience)
  • .8972 - Florida (1.58 avg CFB experience)
  • .8909 - Florida State (1.81 avg CFB experience)
  • .8616 - Louisville (2.43 avg CFB experience)
  • .8654 - Stanford (1.89 avg CFB experience)
  • .8603 - SMU (2.02 avg CFB experience)
  • .8462 - Syracuse (1.68 avg CFB experience)
  • .8657 - NC State (1.59 avg CFB experience)
  • .8648 - Virginia Tech (2.00 CFB experience)
  • .8590 - Pittsburgh (1.80 CFB experience)
  • .9000 - Texas A&M (1.81 CFB experience)
 
Advertisement
On paper we're very closely matched at an aggregate level.

MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
  • Wide Receiver (Miami .9252, Texas A&M .8952)
  • Running Back (Miami .9064, Texas A&M .8854)
  • Quarterback (Miami .9062, Texas A&M .8878)
  • Defensive End (Miami .9301, Texas A&M .8963)
  • Linebacker (Miami .9002, Texas A&M .8952)
  • Safety (Miami .8960, Pittsburgh .8665)
  • Cornerback (Miami .9083, Pittsburgh .8639)
TEXAS A&M POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
  • Tight Ends (Texas A&M .8925, Miami .8846)
  • Offensive Line (Texas A&M .9074, Miami .8922)
  • Defensive Tackle (Texas A&M .9240, Miami .9213)
  • Safety (Texas A&M .9189, Miami .8960)
  • Cornerback (Texas A&M .9260, Miami .9160)
  • Special Teams (Texas A&M .7499, Miami .6999)

The Aggies are the second most talented team on paper that we've faced this season after Notre Dame:

2025 SCHEDULE OPPOSITION COMPOSITE
  • .9012 - Notre Dame (1.61 avg CFB experience)
  • .8446 - South Florida (1.91 avg CFB experience)
  • .8972 - Florida (1.58 avg CFB experience)
  • .8909 - Florida State (1.81 avg CFB experience)
  • .8616 - Louisville (2.43 avg CFB experience)
  • .8654 - Stanford (1.89 avg CFB experience)
  • .8603 - SMU (2.02 avg CFB experience)
  • .8462 - Syracuse (1.68 avg CFB experience)
  • .8657 - NC State (1.59 avg CFB experience)
  • .8648 - Virginia Tech (2.00 CFB experience)
  • .8590 - Pittsburgh (1.80 CFB experience)
  • .9000 - Texas A&M (1.81 CFB experience)
Yes, yes, right, right
go away GIF


Canes by a billion
 
Advertisement
Back
Top