charlie is not coming here folks

[TreOFive]

Why didn't you say so before ?!? Kidding. You're right. He's probably just using it as leverage for a contract extension at UT.

does AG's agent rep him too? I swear the only competent decision AG ever made as a coach is hire that guy. That guy pounced on an opportunity and got his client paid!!!

 

[sebringcanethang23]

How mad are yall gonna be win charlie strong does start winning at texas. And if not there somewhere else. Yall are taking two years of him at a school where whether you believe it or not the roster sucked. Bot only that but alot of the kids he is going to use for his system just enrolled or hasn't enrolled yet. His 2016 class sucks right now but you cant tell me Texas isn't going to get their share in Texas. He beat Oklahoma who may very well be in the playoff in his second year. No one else on the list has done that with the exception of folks we have no shot at like Kelly or Paterson. Herman is undefeated and could stay in Houston waiting on that Texas job to open up. I personally do not think Charlie's coaching style fits that conference as everyone is playing hail Mary over there. Better suited for ACC , SEC, OR BIG conferences where he van play aggressive defenses and run and balanced offense. Would bot be mad with this take or a Dan Mullen who i feel could be lured away. Best candidate on that list by far and would make us 10x better then Al was here and we would at least compete in our conference.

 

[TreOFive]

1. How mad are yall gonna be win charlie strong does start winning at texas. And if not there somewhere else. Yall are taking two years of him at a school where whether you believe it or not the roster sucked. Bot only that but alot of the kids he is going to use for his system just enrolled or hasn't enrolled yet. His 2016 class sucks right now but you cant tell me Texas isn't going to get their share in Texas. 2. He beat Oklahoma who may very well be in the playoff in his second year. No one else on the list has done that with the exception of folks we have no shot at like Kelly or Paterson. Herman is undefeated and could stay in Houston waiting on that Texas job to open up. 3. I personally do not think Charlie's coaching style fits that conference as everyone is playing hail Mary over there. 4. Better suited for ACC , SEC, OR BIG conferences where he van play aggressive defenses and run and balanced offense. Would bot be mad with this take or a Dan Mullen who i feel could be lured away. Best candidate on that list by far and would make us 10x better then Al was here and we would at least compete in our conference.

1. how mad will you be if we hire a losing coach and he loses here?
2. broken clock is right twice a day
3. the "coaching style" excuse is just as false as the "SEC is the best conference" argument. With this rationale, AG will eventually be successful if he can find a program/conference that macthes well with his coaching style. Fact is some coordinators/coaches are one hit wonders (muskrat) (shannon, scrong, muskrat) all had success as coordinators and showed promis as HC until they got exposed
4. this just false and not founded on any facts

 

[sebringcanethang23]

1. How mad are yall gonna be win charlie strong does start winning at texas. And if not there somewhere else. Yall are taking two years of him at a school where whether you believe it or not the roster sucked. Bot only that but alot of the kids he is going to use for his system just enrolled or hasn't enrolled yet. His 2016 class sucks right now but you cant tell me Texas isn't going to get their share in Texas. 2. He beat Oklahoma who may very well be in the playoff in his second year. No one else on the list has done that with the exception of folks we have no shot at like Kelly or Paterson. Herman is undefeated and could stay in Houston waiting on that Texas job to open up. 3. I personally do not think Charlie's coaching style fits that conference as everyone is playing hail Mary over there. 4. Better suited for ACC , SEC, OR BIG conferences where he van play aggressive defenses and run and balanced offense. Would bot be mad with this take or a Dan Mullen who i feel could be lured away. Best candidate on that list by far and would make us 10x better then Al was here and we would at least compete in our conference.

1. how mad will you be if we hire a losing coach and he loses here?
2. broken clock is right twice a day
3. the "coaching style" excuse is just as false as the "SEC is the best conference" argument. With this rationale, AG will eventually be successful if he can find a program/conference that macthes well with his coaching style. Fact is some coordinators/coaches are one hit wonders (muskrat) (shannon, scrong, muskrat) all had success as coordinators and showed promis as HC until they got exposed
4. this just false and not founded on any facts

Then neither are the butch arguments

 

[TreOFive]

1. How mad are yall gonna be win charlie strong does start winning at texas. And if not there somewhere else. Yall are taking two years of him at a school where whether you believe it or not the roster sucked. Bot only that but alot of the kids he is going to use for his system just enrolled or hasn't enrolled yet. His 2016 class sucks right now but you cant tell me Texas isn't going to get their share in Texas. 2. He beat Oklahoma who may very well be in the playoff in his second year. No one else on the list has done that with the exception of folks we have no shot at like Kelly or Paterson. Herman is undefeated and could stay in Houston waiting on that Texas job to open up. 3. I personally do not think Charlie's coaching style fits that conference as everyone is playing hail Mary over there. 4. Better suited for ACC , SEC, OR BIG conferences where he van play aggressive defenses and run and balanced offense. Would bot be mad with this take or a Dan Mullen who i feel could be lured away. Best candidate on that list by far and would make us 10x better then Al was here and we would at least compete in our conference.

1. how mad will you be if we hire a losing coach and he loses here?
2. broken clock is right twice a day
3. the "coaching style" excuse is just as false as the "SEC is the best conference" argument. With this rationale, AG will eventually be successful if he can find a program/conference that macthes well with his coaching style. Fact is some coordinators/coaches are one hit wonders (muskrat) (shannon, scrong, muskrat) all had success as coordinators and showed promis as HC until they got exposed
4. this just false and not founded on any facts

Then neither are the butch arguments

yup because butch has never succeeded anywhere...he has not established a winning record on any level...no rings, no championships....one hit wonder just like the rest of the corches that have been mentioned.

 

[sebringcanethang23]

1. How mad are yall gonna be win charlie strong does start winning at texas. And if not there somewhere else. Yall are taking two years of him at a school where whether you believe it or not the roster sucked. Bot only that but alot of the kids he is going to use for his system just enrolled or hasn't enrolled yet. His 2016 class sucks right now but you cant tell me Texas isn't going to get their share in Texas. 2. He beat Oklahoma who may very well be in the playoff in his second year. No one else on the list has done that with the exception of folks we have no shot at like Kelly or Paterson. Herman is undefeated and could stay in Houston waiting on that Texas job to open up. 3. I personally do not think Charlie's coaching style fits that conference as everyone is playing hail Mary over there. 4. Better suited for ACC , SEC, OR BIG conferences where he van play aggressive defenses and run and balanced offense. Would bot be mad with this take or a Dan Mullen who i feel could be lured away. Best candidate on that list by far and would make us 10x better then Al was here and we would at least compete in our conference.

1. how mad will you be if we hire a losing coach and he loses here?
2. broken clock is right twice a day
3. the "coaching style" excuse is just as false as the "SEC is the best conference" argument. With this rationale, AG will eventually be successful if he can find a program/conference that macthes well with his coaching style. Fact is some coordinators/coaches are one hit wonders (muskrat) (shannon, scrong, muskrat) all had success as coordinators and showed promis as HC until they got exposed
4. this just false and not founded on any facts

Then neither are the butch arguments

yup because butch has never succeeded anywhere...he has not established a winning record on any level...no rings, no championships....one hit wonder just like the rest of the corches that have been mentioned.

I agree. Just feel strong would do well here and pull recruits. No facts other then watching what he did at Louisville with Florida kids. Tried it at Texas but it wont fly cuz Texas wont need florida kids. My first choice is Mullen tho if Im hiring. Wanted him the first go around.

 

[UMFarArcher]

This board cracks me up. 95% of what is posted is either total garbage or is based on incorrect facts. Do you really think we would offer Strong 2.5M?

I would hope not.

Seeing what he's doing at Texas, I'd say $200,000 at most.