Rosier gives us a better chance to win over Kaaya
Based on what? The game vs Duke that he didn't win, our special teams won the game? Or his magnificent performances in the scrimmages and intrasquads in which he barely beat out a walk on for the back up job. Iirc the status of the backup job was Brad at number 1 and everyone else light years behind, until Richt had no choice but to pick a name out of a bag of garbage just to give someone the second string reps.
Rosier may be an upgrade just based purely off the fact that he can run and mask the inefficiency of the OL, but what's to suggest that Richt will cater his offense to his skill set? He wouldn't. And Brad is 10x the passer Rosier is so it'd be a noticeable downgrade
Rosier did win that game.
Or do we only refer to the pass interference on Artie Burns' INT as BS to justify the blown calls on our kick return? Do we only refer to Duke's go ahead TD as a phantom TD to justify the touchdown we probably shouldn't have gotten on the kick return? It can't be one or the other. Rosier won that game.
What you just said is being "one way or another". The calls happened, the QB was given that TD, and Rosier was losing the game before the best return in the history of cfb.
If you're going to look at it that way then Brad would have won vs FSU if Waltons TD wasn't called back, could have beat UNC if they would have made the correct call on their TD.
My main point is that Richt isn't catering his offense to the QB under center and in this offense you have to be able to make the throws which I'm confident in saying that if Brad can't make them, Rosier sure as **** cant. Richt isn't going to call designed runs for Rosier or have his own different playbook like Coley did.
