Chad Thomas

Like Pete said earlier this is brad and chad's team now and we haven't had leaders like those guys in a while



Yeah because Duke and Denzel weren't leaders

Sorry to say..but they weren't. Especially Denzel. This team didn't need a "leader by example". We were not that mentally strong as a unit to have a leader like that. Sean Taylor lead by example and never talked much because that 2003 team was mentally tough. Reggie Wayne and Damione Lewis led that 2000 team by example. They were mentally tough.

Ed Reed and Michael Irvin led by example AND made their presence known. Got in someones face when warranted or when they weren't doing their job. I was so sick of hearing guys say, "Well, its not the coaches fault, guys were freelancing too much and not sticking to the scheme." Ok...So what did you do about it? What do you think Jon Vilma would have done if someone freelanced and did whatever the ***** they wanted on his defense?

So yes, were they very good-great players for us? Of Course. Were they great leaders? The kind this team needed? No.

Even I can't answer this question, but how can you quantify Denzel's leadership without knowing what is going on Monday through Friday? Who's to say Denzel and Duke didn't motivate their teammates too? I am just not buying this "new leaders new team" deal because we have been doing a rinse and repeat of this for the past ten years. Especially with a lame duck coach I'm not sure how much two guys can change something. Would love to be wrong

Fair rebuttal. I will take you back to 2002, when that defense was absolutely getting shredded by the running QB and getting ran on up the middle week after week. We played TENN and Sean Taylor freelanced out of his lane and Cedric Houston ran for 74 yards until Kelly Jennings walked him down. They didn't score but as soon as they got to the sidelines, Jon Vilma checked Sean immediately. Sean said, My bad and it didn't happen again. At least that game. Tenn ended up rushing for less then 100 yards IRRC. THAT'S a leader. Who checks the immortal Sean Taylor? Jon Vilma that's who!

Vilma didn't sit by and wait for us to continue to get gashed and then say in the postgame, "Hey, its not the coaches fault, guys are freelancing too much." And shrug his shoulders.

You don't like the scheme? Fine. Me neither. You hate Al golden? Me too. You hate Dno and most of these coaches? So do I. But don't sit here and tell me these guys were the blueprint for leaders when the same **** is happening every week and no one is holding anyone accountable "Monday through Friday" like you say.

I don't know if Kaaya and CThomas will be leaders or not. Time will tell. Its been so long since we had REAL ones most of the kids on this board wouldn't know what one looked like. Sad stuff.
 
Advertisement
Like Pete said earlier this is brad and chad's team now and we haven't had leaders like those guys in a while



Yeah because Duke and Denzel weren't leaders

Sorry to say..but they weren't. Especially Denzel. This team didn't need a "leader by example". We were not that mentally strong as a unit to have a leader like that. Sean Taylor lead by example and never talked much because that 2003 team was mentally tough. Reggie Wayne and Damione Lewis led that 2000 team by example. They were mentally tough.

Ed Reed and Michael Irvin led by example AND made their presence known. Got in someones face when warranted or when they weren't doing their job. I was so sick of hearing guys say, "Well, its not the coaches fault, guys were freelancing too much and not sticking to the scheme." Ok...So what did you do about it? What do you think Jon Vilma would have done if someone freelanced and did whatever the ***** they wanted on his defense?

So yes, were they very good-great players for us? Of Course. Were they great leaders? The kind this team needed? No.

Even I can't answer this question, but how can you quantify Denzel's leadership without knowing what is going on Monday through Friday? Who's to say Denzel and Duke didn't motivate their teammates too? I am just not buying this "new leaders new team" deal because we have been doing a rinse and repeat of this for the past ten years. Especially with a lame duck coach I'm not sure how much two guys can change something. Would love to be wrong

I don't know what type of leaders these new guys are more than likely it'll be more of the same. However, I touched on it in my post after the FSU game and people thought I was hating on them boys but I was really bothered with how accepting they were of being subbed out of big games. Even worse I ***ing hated how they always found a reason to be cheesin after loses. Someone wrote a article about how accepting people throughout the program are after losing a game compared to the old days where a losing a game guys acted as if a family member died. It's easy to just take on the ****** personality of the ******* in charge however a strong willed person will never be cool with failure no matter how many losers they are around.
 
Every year there seems to be new freshman that are going to be the leaders, the ones that turn it around. Yet, the team sleepwalks through the season with half-hearted, uninspired performances, embarrassments on national television and limp to the end only to go to a meaningless bowl game - which we end up losing.

For all the hope each annual recruiting class inevitably brings, one thing remains constant in this stagnating quagmire of mediocrity and high-school"esque" cheerleading.
 
Those two are going to turn this into a top 5 class.

I wouldn't go that far. But it's nice to see some leaders on each side of the ball.

We don't need a top five class. We need to get the kids that the staff evaluates as best filling our needs. Just because some subscription scouting service evaluates a kid as 4-5* does not mean our staff evaluates him the same way, or that he best fills our needs or would be the best to play the way our coaches want him to do. (And please, no snide comments about how our system sucks, since I'm just talking about coaches making their own evaluations, I know we have issues with our defensive philosophy, but that is a different issue.) Just because a kid looks good locally, does not mean he fits what we need him to do.

I've been following this stuff since the mid-80's, used to subscribe to almost every recruiting newsletter, and know that there's often a huge disparity between the coaches' evaluations of a kid and the newsletters.
 
Like Pete said earlier this is brad and chad's team now and we haven't had leaders like those guys in a while



Yeah because Duke and Denzel weren't leaders

Sorry to say..but they weren't. Especially Denzel. This team didn't need a "leader by example". We were not that mentally strong as a unit to have a leader like that. Sean Taylor lead by example and never talked much because that 2003 team was mentally tough. Reggie Wayne and Damione Lewis led that 2000 team by example. They were mentally tough.

Ed Reed and Michael Irvin led by example AND made their presence known. Got in someones face when warranted or when they weren't doing their job. I was so sick of hearing guys say, "Well, its not the coaches fault, guys were freelancing too much and not sticking to the scheme." Ok...So what did you do about it? What do you think Jon Vilma would have done if someone freelanced and did whatever the ***** they wanted on his defense?

So yes, were they very good-great players for us? Of Course. Were they great leaders? The kind this team needed? No.

Even I can't answer this question, but how can you quantify Denzel's leadership without knowing what is going on Monday through Friday? Who's to say Denzel and Duke didn't motivate their teammates too? I am just not buying this "new leaders new team" deal because we have been doing a rinse and repeat of this for the past ten years. Especially with a lame duck coach I'm not sure how much two guys can change something. Would love to be wrong

Fair rebuttal. I will take you back to 2002, when that defense was absolutely getting shredded by the running QB and getting ran on up the middle week after week. We played TENN and Sean Taylor freelanced out of his lane and Cedric Houston ran for 74 yards until Kelly Jennings walked him down. They didn't score but as soon as they got to the sidelines, Jon Vilma checked Sean immediately. Sean said, My bad and it didn't happen again. At least that game. Tenn ended up rushing for less then 100 yards IRRC. THAT'S a leader. Who checks the immortal Sean Taylor? Jon Vilma that's who!

Vilma didn't sit by and wait for us to continue to get gashed and then say in the postgame, "Hey, its not the coaches fault, guys are freelancing too much." And shrug his shoulders.

You don't like the scheme? Fine. Me neither. You hate Al golden? Me too. You hate Dno and most of these coaches? So do I. But don't sit here and tell me these guys were the blueprint for leaders when the same **** is happening every week and no one is holding anyone accountable "Monday through Friday" like you say.

I don't know if Kaaya and CThomas will be leaders or not. Time will tell. Its been so long since we had REAL ones most of the kids on this board wouldn't know what one looked like. Sad stuff.

Interesting story. Maybe that's what happens when you recruit prima donnas who think they are superstars. That's why primo recruit Willie Williams could not make it even if he didn't have off the field problems. Maybe that's why sometimes the lower rated recruits end up the better players, because they worked harder. That was our formula in the 1980's, despite all the revisionist history on here by just barely pubescent know-it-alls that think our great teams were filled with elite recruits. They were not. Even the 2001 team was not filled with the highest ranking recruits. D.J. Williams was no. 1 player on everybody's lists, yet in August, when they both showed up in Coral Gables, Jon Vilma was the better player. Where the **** was Vilma on the lists? Probably nowhere...maybe at best a 3 star. Same with Ed Reed, same with Clint Portis, Jeremy Shockey. etc.
 
Like Pete said earlier this is brad and chad's team now and we haven't had leaders like those guys in a while



Yeah because Duke and Denzel weren't leaders

Maybe the problem was with other kids who didn't accept their leadership. If we have kids freelancing, missing on defensive assignments, not running right patters, missing assigned blocks, than there is something wrong mentally. Whether leadership is the problem, or ineffective coaching, I don't know. Some kids won't accept criticism or coaching. If one of most talented WRs is smoking dope all the time, instead of in the film room, etc., that suggests a problem, no matter how talented he is. Maybe benching him works, maybe not.
 
You guys are so gullible. Sorry beat UVA and Pitt and shut it. Then say something. Been hearing this every single year. Sorry action speaks louder than words. Chad has zero sacks in his career. Dont want to hear

Yeah, would expect a ton of sacks after such a long career at the U. The problem is, none of our players get many sacks, and that to me spells another problem, which we've discussed endlessly on this board.
 
You guys are so gullible. Sorry beat UVA and Pitt and shut it. Then say something. Been hearing this every single year. Sorry action speaks louder than words. Chad has zero sacks in his career. Dont want to hear

Yeah, would expect a ton of sacks after such a long career at the U. The problem is, none of our players get many sacks, and that to me spells another problem, which we've discussed endlessly on this board.
Plenty of true FR are getting sacks all over CFB. I agree its El Foldos scheme that is causing this. At the same time he has zero sacks. Zero
 
Like Pete said earlier this is brad and chad's team now and we haven't had leaders like those guys in a while



Yeah because Duke and Denzel weren't leaders

Maybe the problem was with other kids who didn't accept their leadership. If we have kids freelancing, missing on defensive assignments, not running right patters, missing assigned blocks, than there is something wrong mentally. Whether leadership is the problem, or ineffective coaching, I don't know. Some kids won't accept criticism or coaching. If one of most talented WRs is smoking dope all the time, instead of in the film room, etc., that suggests a problem, no matter how talented he is. Maybe benching him works, maybe not.

it all starts and ends with folden
 
Advertisement
Well it's already been said that the underclass men were calling out the upperclassmen for the effort they were giving late in the season....
 
Last edited:
This **** is funny. How the **** is chad going to lead the team when he might not even start next year with aqm moving to sde.

I highly doubt chad or brad are going to be getting in somebody face trying to talk ****.

People keep bring up ray, irvin, and reed as leaders but those guys are ******* rare. Guys in the nfl say they never seen anyone one like ray.

Leadership don't mean **** when you are losing. You don't hear about great leadership on **** teams winning brings that out.
 
This **** is funny. How the **** is chad going to lead the team when he might not even start next year with aqm moving to sde.

I highly doubt chad or brad are going to be getting in somebody face trying to talk ****.

People keep bring up ray, irvin, and reed as leaders but those guys are ****ing rare. Guys in the nfl say they never seen anyone one like ray.

Leadership don't mean **** when you are losing. You don't hear about great leadership on **** teams winning brings that out.


+10000000
 
This **** is funny. How the **** is chad going to lead the team when he might not even start next year with aqm moving to sde.

I highly doubt chad or brad are going to be getting in somebody face trying to talk ****.

People keep bring up ray, irvin, and reed as leaders but those guys are ****ing rare. Guys in the nfl say they never seen anyone one like ray.

Leadership don't mean **** when you are losing. You don't hear about great leadership on **** teams winning brings that out.

You must be under the age of 25. So you are saying we had no leaders on those 98 and 99 teams? Don't tell that to Nate Webster or Al Blades. Thanks for stopping by though!

And you my friend are delusional if you think Chad Thomas will not be starting in some capacity. ***** what the position changes say.
 
Advertisement
Those two are going to turn this into a top 5 class.

That won't happen. Top 10 class though is certainly possible if Chad and Brad close. Top 5 would require a lot of kids to flip to us. We were on pace for potentially a top 5 class I. August but we all k iw hiw that turned out

No offense but top 10 is not possible.

its possible but its highly unlikely to happen. it would take,Green,Houston,Sapp,Callaway,Brightwell,Norton,Scott,Lewis,Fenton,and the Davis'. so maybe your right lol. im hoping for a top 15 class i would happy with that given our circumstances
 
Back
Top