WestGA'Cane
Senior
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2020
- Messages
- 2,719
It's clear that ESPN hates us..Tess only the early game after New Year's Eve
!
Car keys are currently next to his play sheetThat kicker just ruined whatever sobriety Sark had going on.
He will be exiled from Austin at least.He's gonna have to leave the country, let's be honest
Targeting was never needed because the rules already stated you can't hit with your head or hit others in the head. than to eject kids. stupidThey should definitely get rid of the ejection that carries over to the next game for 2nd half targeting. Cost ASU their best DB for first half when they gave up long passes. Just ridiculous
See what you hit, hit what you see. I like the no -call. Defender's head was up.
2 players approx. the same height collide in a bang-bang play. Would love to see Target-lovers strap on a helmet and get an understanding for the speed of the game and the inevitability of contact when wearing a piece of equipment extending from the top and sides of your head.
Shocking how Texas can’t run the ball.
Why was Sark talking to the kicker?
No launch, no crown. Helmets making contact has been a part of football since.....forever.I have no idea what targeting is
Yup. Just throw the 15 yard flag. Eject guys on the spot when it's really egregious like they do in the NFL. Stupid for it to carry over the next game because of which half the foul happened in.Targeting was never needed because the rules already stated you can't hit with your head or hit others in the head. than to eject kids. stupid
A kicker with a perm![]()
It was the shoulder that contacted the Texas receiver, and according to the letter of the law you cited, was forcible contact to a defenseless player. Problem is that football is played at a break neck speed with collisions inherent. The rule, unfortunately, needs to be INTERPRETED on a case-by-case basis with a grain of common sense. Not to be a jerk, but people who haven't played don't have a clue.Targeting is forcible contact (by helmet, elbow, shoulder, arm, etc) to the head or neck of a defenseless player.
That was a helmet to helmet hit on a defenseless player.
You might not like the rule, but that is targeting by rule.
And that rule would 1000% have been enforced if the colors were switched.
The earlier hit on the UT WR was not targeting because it was the chest of the defender that contacted the UT receiver’s helmet.