5Rings&an Asterisk
Junior
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2018
- Messages
- 1,732
Any team coached by Larry Coker is not the greatest of all time. They couldn't score an offensive touchdown against Boston College. They were lucky to beat Virginia Tech due to a dropped 2-point conversion by Wilford. They also played a weak Big East schedule and 0 top 10 teams. Even their opponent in the Rose Bowl (Nebraska) was a joke and got trounced by Colorado in the Big 12 Championship Game. Conversely, 1995 Nebraska crushed all of their opponents. They beat 3 top 10 teams. Miami beat zero.
So we're basing it on the coach and not the talent on the field and what the teams did? When you consider how bad a coach Coker was and that only two teams gave them a game, I think you see just how talented that Miami team was. Every team has that one tough game on their way to a championship and will get a lucky bounce. Dorsey had a bad day at BC and Virginia Tech is just straight up one of the toughest places to play, but they found a way to win. Those two game alone would give Miami the nod. Nebraska wasn't going to run away with a game against Miami. They weren't in any close games. You even saw Nick Saban this year panic a bit against Clemson because his team hadn't played any close games. You want to argue that a one dimensional, archaic offense like what Nebraska was running was going to work against the team that changed the way offense is played in college football? That's laughable. And before you mention Florida, they were soft on defense. That beatdown finally woke up Spurrier to the fact he needed to worry about the defense and he went out and hired Bob Stoops.