Canes To Adidas Confirmed

It's the Nike contract (probably in the $3M-$4M range) plus an extra $3M per year.

Probably one of the biggest apparel deals in college sports.

The article says our deal is most likely in the Asu ballpark of 8 years 33m (4.125 a year).

I don't see how it could be $3m more per season than Nike if it's only $4.125m per season going forward unless Nike was only paying Miami a little over a million dollars per year.

IMO Nike was probably paying us in the 1.5 to 3m range (pure speculation)
Miami's payout was said to be low from Nike. **** Oregon only gets paid 2.8 million a year from Nike... Bottom line Adidas is paying big bucks right now. Michigan getting 8.2 million a year, Louisville 7.7 million a year and ucla 7.5 million a year. One thing, only part of the money will be straight up cash the other will be the form of apparel and other gear.

Nike was paying Oregon "only" $2.8m and they probably signed that contract in a building Phil Knight donated $75m to build.
 
Advertisement
Porter

Jim Larranaga, on ACC conference call, says shoe companies can affect recruiting but the quality of a program is the most important factor.
11:01am - 5 Jan 15
Basketball recruiting is a different animal. I'm not worried about this affecting football recruiting one iota. We've much bigger problems as long as Golden is still the head coach of this program.
 
This is gonna affect basketball recruiting, it did for Lousville.

Larranaga shiuld be ****ed, football not so much

Yup because that National Title, and Kansas Jayhawks, along with Michigan are sure struggling in BBall. GTFO


Lolz


I never said it affects on field performance, just that Lousiville lost a recruit because they weren't a Nike school. And that's a fact.

1 recruit? Ohh no because they won't have another lined up. 1 recurit is what we are worried about? We can't even get top transfers or recruits so wtf is the difference. We won't sway anyone from any of the big BBall schools. We get a solid set of guys and make a run once every 4-5 years. There are 4-5 Adidas schools pulling recruits and making the tournament and going deep every year. If the brand of shoes is what we have left to pull recruits that is saying more about how far this program is in the sewer than us switching.
 
It's the Nike contract (probably in the $3M-$4M range) plus an extra $3M per year.

Probably one of the biggest apparel deals in college sports.

The article says our deal is most likely in the Asu ballpark of 8 years 33m (4.125 a year).

I don't see how it could be $3m more per season than Nike if it's only $4.125m per season going forward unless Nike was only paying Miami a little over a million dollars per year.

IMO Nike was probably paying us in the 1.5 to 3m range (pure speculation)

"Make no mistake: money is the primary factor in the switch. Adidas’ winning bid is believed to be in the ballpark of the eight-year, $33 million pact it announced with Arizona State last month. That pays ASU $3 million more than its old deal with Nike."

ASU's eight-year, $33M Adidas deal is $3M higher than their old deal with Nike. We do not know if this is $3M per year or $3M in total.

Either way, the article is not saying that Miami's current deal is $3M more per season than Nike's deal was. They are talking about ASU. We do not know where this deal stands with regard to our previous Nike deal and we do not even know what this total deal is.

We do... it was 3m per year.

Adidas wouldn't go into negotiations trying to sway a school by offering up 375k more a year
 
Over/ under.. On which number game we lose nxt yr does the al golden excuse machine blame the Adidas gear? Say the number is 3rd loss.. Ima go under haha
 
The article says our deal is most likely in the Asu ballpark of 8 years 33m (4.125 a year).

I don't see how it could be $3m more per season than Nike if it's only $4.125m per season going forward unless Nike was only paying Miami a little over a million dollars per year.

IMO Nike was probably paying us in the 1.5 to 3m range (pure speculation)
Miami's payout was said to be low from Nike. **** Oregon only gets paid 2.8 million a year from Nike... Bottom line Adidas is paying big bucks right now. Michigan getting 8.2 million a year, Louisville 7.7 million a year and ucla 7.5 million a year. One thing, only part of the money will be straight up cash the other will be the form of apparel and other gear.

Nike was paying Oregon "only" $2.8m and they probably signed that contract in a building Phil Knight donated $75m to build.

Good point. You can't look at Oregon's number of $2.8m since they get Nike investment in so many other ways. It's an outlier.
 
If this deal doesn't help our athletics (including Golden's buy out) F this admin for real.
 
I don't see how it could be $3m more per season than Nike if it's only $4.125m per season going forward unless Nike was only paying Miami a little over a million dollars per year.

IMO Nike was probably paying us in the 1.5 to 3m range (pure speculation)
Miami's payout was said to be low from Nike. **** Oregon only gets paid 2.8 million a year from Nike... Bottom line Adidas is paying big bucks right now. Michigan getting 8.2 million a year, Louisville 7.7 million a year and ucla 7.5 million a year. One thing, only part of the money will be straight up cash the other will be the form of apparel and other gear.

Nike was paying Oregon "only" $2.8m and they probably signed that contract in a building Phil Knight donated $75m to build.

Good point. You can't look at Oregon's number of $2.8m since they get Nike investment in so many other ways. It's an outlier.

Their facilities are insane.
 
B6mWQzUCcAENYaQ.webp

- Coach L
 
Advertisement
If Jim Harbaugh is smart, he will force Michigan to break their contract with Adidas and switch to Nike. There is no way he will ever win anything at Michigan if his team is wearing Adidas bullhiza stuff.
I've still got some deep connections at Michigan, and they said the Adidas contract is number one on Harbaugh's list even ahead of hiring a staff. That's how important it is to him.
 
The article says our deal is most likely in the Asu ballpark of 8 years 33m (4.125 a year).

I don't see how it could be $3m more per season than Nike if it's only $4.125m per season going forward unless Nike was only paying Miami a little over a million dollars per year.

IMO Nike was probably paying us in the 1.5 to 3m range (pure speculation)

"Make no mistake: money is the primary factor in the switch. Adidas’ winning bid is believed to be in the ballpark of the eight-year, $33 million pact it announced with Arizona State last month. That pays ASU $3 million more than its old deal with Nike."

ASU's eight-year, $33M Adidas deal is $3M higher than their old deal with Nike. We do not know if this is $3M per year or $3M in total.

Either way, the article is not saying that Miami's current deal is $3M more per season than Nike's deal was. They are talking about ASU. We do not know where this deal stands with regard to our previous Nike deal and we do not even know what this total deal is.

We do... it was 3m per year.

Adidas wouldn't go into negotiations trying to sway a school by offering up 375k more a year

I agree that's probably the case, but the article doesn't specify, so we don't know. Either way, that's not my point.

My point is that Republicane asked how can Miami's deal be $3M more per season than Nike, but the $3M difference was in reference to ASU, not Miami.

My pure guess would be that the contract is at least in the realm of $40M/8 years because, presumably, our previous Nike contract was higher than ASU's and we'd need a similar percentage increase ($3M/$1.125M = ~300%) to make switching look attractive. All speculation though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I bet this is why we couldn't flip the Jones kid from mighty FIU. He knew this deal with Adidas was going down. Al is fighting like a wounded jackal to flip FIU recruits, and now they throw this Adidas cloud at him.
 
I don't see how it could be $3m more per season than Nike if it's only $4.125m per season going forward unless Nike was only paying Miami a little over a million dollars per year.

IMO Nike was probably paying us in the 1.5 to 3m range (pure speculation)

"Make no mistake: money is the primary factor in the switch. Adidas’ winning bid is believed to be in the ballpark of the eight-year, $33 million pact it announced with Arizona State last month. That pays ASU $3 million more than its old deal with Nike."

ASU's eight-year, $33M Adidas deal is $3M higher than their old deal with Nike. We do not know if this is $3M per year or $3M in total.

Either way, the article is not saying that Miami's current deal is $3M more per season than Nike's deal was. They are talking about ASU. We do not know where this deal stands with regard to our previous Nike deal and we do not even know what this total deal is.

We do... it was 3m per year.

Adidas wouldn't go into negotiations trying to sway a school by offering up 375k more a year

I agree that's probably the case, but the article doesn't specify, so we don't know. Either way, that's not my point.

My point is that Republicane asked how can Miami's deal be $3M more per season than Nike, but the $3M difference was in reference to ASU, not Miami.

Nike paid Arizona in the 1.5-2.1 million dollar range per year before they signed the deal with Adidas.
 
I don't see how it could be $3m more per season than Nike if it's only $4.125m per season going forward unless Nike was only paying Miami a little over a million dollars per year.

IMO Nike was probably paying us in the 1.5 to 3m range (pure speculation)

"Make no mistake: money is the primary factor in the switch. Adidas’ winning bid is believed to be in the ballpark of the eight-year, $33 million pact it announced with Arizona State last month. That pays ASU $3 million more than its old deal with Nike."

ASU's eight-year, $33M Adidas deal is $3M higher than their old deal with Nike. We do not know if this is $3M per year or $3M in total.

Either way, the article is not saying that Miami's current deal is $3M more per season than Nike's deal was. They are talking about ASU. We do not know where this deal stands with regard to our previous Nike deal and we do not even know what this total deal is.

We do... it was 3m per year.

Adidas wouldn't go into negotiations trying to sway a school by offering up 375k more a year

I agree that's probably the case, but the article doesn't specify, so we don't know. Either way, that's not my point.

My point is that Republicane asked how can Miami's deal be $3M more per season than Nike, but the $3M difference was in reference to ASU, not Miami.

My pure guess would be that the contract is at least in the realm of $40M/8 years because, presumably, our previous Nike contract was higher than ASU's and we'd need a similar percentage increase ($3M/$1.125M = ~300%) to make switching look attractive. All speculation though.

It is also public information that the university releases. We do know.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/spor...itching-apparel-from-nike-to-adidas/20476937/

And without a doubt UM officials leaked that "3m a year number" to the media so they could report it. Matt Porter isn't just randomly speculating on how much more Adidas offered
 
Al has obviously done a great job protecting the brand if we got the top equipment deal in college athletics.
 
Advertisement
Good news nike made some truly terrible jerseys and they brought back the ******* clam. These nike loyalists are just sheep, there is no quality difference all this stuff comes from the same sweat shops, now the school has more money and a chance for a normal looking uniform good choice
 
Back
Top