Can Someone Tell Me What Golden's One Signature Win Has Been

at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.

Lol. The team we played was the same team who struggled with Toledo the week before.

Slurp slurp slurp

Hey, why the Golden Ticket avatar if you are truly done with golden?
 
Advertisement
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.


Golden didn't beat UF the year before. That record is entirely irrelevant. Bottom line: every team has injuries.

There is no such thing as a "signature win" over a team that does not have a winning record.
 
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.

Lol. The team we played was the same team who struggled with Toledo the week before.

Slurp slurp slurp

Hey, why the Golden Ticket avatar if you are truly done with golden?

He's done with Folden until our next commit or win, whichever comes first.
 
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.

Lol. The team we played was the same team who struggled with Toledo the week before.

Yeah, never mind the fact that Georgia Southern beat them in the swamp even worse then we did at home.
 
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.


Golden didn't beat UF the year before. That record is entirely irrelevant. Bottom line: every team has injuries.

There is no such thing as a "signature win" over a team that does not have a winning record.
"the fact that driskell led the team meant they were destined to lose 4-5 games"...

.. the driskell led team went 11-2.. no relevance at all, you're right.
 
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.

Lol. The team we played was the same team who struggled with Toledo the week before.

Slurp slurp slurp

Hey, why the Golden Ticket avatar if you are truly done with golden?
i've had the same avatar and haven't changed it.. doesn't really matter either way though does it?
 
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.
Remember who you are dealing with. A lot ppl have such a hatred for Golden they can't go un bias and answer a simple question or read something that doesn't refrence "**** golden" you'll be called a slurped. Lol

Its also hilarious because I could these are the same ppl that were on Golden's **** when the Canes were on their little winning streak
 
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.


Golden didn't beat UF the year before. That record is entirely irrelevant. Bottom line: every team has injuries.

There is no such thing as a "signature win" over a team that does not have a winning record.
"the fact that driskell led the team meant they were destined to lose 4-5 games"...

.. the driskell led team went 11-2.. no relevance at all, you're right.

fair enough regarding Jedi's post.

but your claim above, "at that point in time, it was UF. the whole team got injured and went to ****[,]" does not make golden's victory over a 4-8 team a signature win, irrespective of how many injuries UF may have had.

Bottom line: Golden does not have one -- not f'n one -- signature win. That's inconceivable for a guy that has been a head coach for the better part of a decade. Outside of the press conference, he's incompetent.
 
Advertisement
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.
Remember who you are dealing with. A lot ppl have such a hatred for Golden they can't go un bias and answer a simple question or read something that doesn't refrence "**** golden" you'll be called a slurped. Lol

Its also hilarious because I could these are the same ppl that were on Golden's **** when the Canes were on their little winning streak

So you're another one standing behind the claim that a win over a 4-8 team is a "signature win"? Wow. i don't even know how to respond to that. It's just a completely indefensible position.
 
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.
Remember who you are dealing with. A lot ppl have such a hatred for Golden they can't go un bias and answer a simple question or read something that doesn't refrence "**** golden" you'll be called a slurped. Lol

Its also hilarious because I could these are the same ppl that were on Golden's **** when the Canes were on their little winning streak

So you're another one standing behind the claim that a win over a 4-8 team is a "signature win"? Wow. i don't even know how to respond to that. It's just a completely indefensible position.

Like DaU83 said "at that point in time" it was a huge win. An unranked team beating a top 10 team is always huge
 
at that point in time, it was UF. the fact that the whole team got injured and went to **** doesn't change that.

You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.


Golden didn't beat UF the year before. That record is entirely irrelevant. Bottom line: every team has injuries.

There is no such thing as a "signature win" over a team that does not have a winning record.
"the fact that driskell led the team meant they were destined to lose 4-5 games"...

.. the driskell led team went 11-2.. no relevance at all, you're right.


Drinskell going 11-2 the year before is meaningless. Your talking about two different teams. A win over a 4-8 team is not a signature win. That's almost as bad as a flute player in a high school band thinking he should win a Grammy.
 
You're an idiot. The fact Driskell was the QB of that team means they were destined to lose 4-5 games even if every single other player on the roster stayed healthy.

Enough with the indirect defenses of Golden already assclown.

I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.
Remember who you are dealing with. A lot ppl have such a hatred for Golden they can't go un bias and answer a simple question or read something that doesn't refrence "**** golden" you'll be called a slurped. Lol

Its also hilarious because I could these are the same ppl that were on Golden's **** when the Canes were on their little winning streak

So you're another one standing behind the claim that a win over a 4-8 team is a "signature win"? Wow. i don't even know how to respond to that. It's just a completely indefensible position.

Like DaU83 said "at that point in time" it was a huge win. An unranked team beating a top 10 team is always huge

But UF was not a top 10 team. UF was not even a top 50 team. You don't base signature wins on preseason rankings.

It may have appeared to be a "signature win," but clearly it was not, given how atrocious UF was.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
I thought you were one of the smarter ones. Unfortunately, not the case. Driskell the year before was 11-2, that alone blows up your theory. Secondly. I answered the question asked. It has nothing to do with defending al golden. The question was what's his signature win, it's UF. The UF team we played was not the same team that ended up 4-8.
Remember who you are dealing with. A lot ppl have such a hatred for Golden they can't go un bias and answer a simple question or read something that doesn't refrence "**** golden" you'll be called a slurped. Lol

Its also hilarious because I could these are the same ppl that were on Golden's **** when the Canes were on their little winning streak

So you're another one standing behind the claim that a win over a 4-8 team is a "signature win"? Wow. i don't even know how to respond to that. It's just a completely indefensible position.

Like DaU83 said "at that point in time" it was a huge win. An unranked team beating a top 10 team is always huge

But UF was not a top 10 team. UF was not even a top 50 team. You don't base signature wins on preseason rankings.

It may have appeared to be a "signature win," but clearly it was not, given how atrocious UF was.

You're wasting your time. When you have to explain to a guy that beating a 4-8 team is not a signature win, you'd have to explain to him that cat **** from the litter box isn't a luxurious truffle coated in sea salt. In other words, just write him off as helpless and hope that he doesn't do the genetic pool a disservice by attempting to reproduce.
 
Arky State is up there. Cincy or Duke this year? Can't recall a winning team from 201-2013
 
Back
Top