It isn't even about us for me. Hey we lost four games that honestly we should have won. However, LSU has not beaten one team on the schedule with a pulse. They just went from unranked to 21 by beating??? A&M! yeah 8-4 A&M! But this looks good for who if LSU is ranked? Wisconsin! I am thinking this whole committee is actually a new way for the powerful big ten to keep up with the southeast. Because we all know what would happen to Peen St even in the acc. They would lose a lot more than 2 games. I would love to see us play them. This whole thing reeks of Big Ten power moves. How is OSU guaranteed a spot even though they are not playing in their conference championship game? Didn't OSU benefit just a couple of years ago over TCU because TCU didn't play in a conference championship game? How in the **** does Aub only fall one spot after losing to Bama. Yet they have four losses. Yet another team that has lost to every team they have faced with a pulse.... it asinine. Only in the minds of a corrupt person can you give a team credit for losing. But when it fits your agenda its pretty easy to justify.
THIS!! they. Change the rhetoric from year to year and there is ZERO consistency. A conference they were bashing for NOT playing in the ship in TCU is now in a position to be "locked" in the top 2. As far as Tennessee and LSU. There is A CLEAR AGENDA TO KEEP A HORRIBLE SEC CONFERENCE RELEVANT. It's outrageous and I know e$ECpn has their hands all over it. This is nothing more than a ratings grab. Don't believe me? Look at the last 4 games in the schedule [provided by Siri]
Who had the better record during this stretch? Regardless of the 4 losses.
Are you telling me that "quality losses" in NOVEMBER now trumps winning in general? That's what I'm supposed to understand? And that losing in September is helping you in December? Beating a team in the top 2 3 weeks ago gets you ranked now? After surrendering SIXTY-ONE points this past week? This whole committee is BULL ****. In EVERY sense of the word
