CANESCANES
Senior
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2024
- Messages
- 4,772
Jeff Brohm talked yesterday about the importance of keeping Cam Ward in the pocket, which I found interesting, so I dug into the numbers. Is Brohm right (statistically speaking)? It's complicated.
Now this is a bit of a self-referential metric. If Ward is out of the pocket, by definition, he's under duress, and QBs under duress are less successful. His OOP stats are good; his in-pocket stats are other-worldly.
It's not that Ward is *better* when he's outside the pocket. It's that, when he does something good outside the pocket, there appears to be a real impact on the defense -- which makes sense, because his magic acts are just agonizing for the other team.
Some numbers: Ward has made an outside the pocket play with positive WPA (i.e. a "successful" play) on 22 different drives this year.Miami has scored TDs on 13 of them, FGs on 3, 1 turnover on downs, 2 INTS (both in red zone) and 3 punts.So basically 19/22 of those drives scored or could've easily.
Moreover, all 6 of the drives that didn't end in points came in the first halves of the last two games (VT & Cal). In the 2H of those games:TD, TD, TD, TD, TD, TD
And keep in mind, those OOP plays aren't all big plays -- just are just turning a sack int a 2-yard gain. But consistently it seems to frustrate defenses beyond just that 1 play.So the lesson isn't so much "keep contain" as "have a short memory" with Cam.
Now this is a bit of a self-referential metric. If Ward is out of the pocket, by definition, he's under duress, and QBs under duress are less successful. His OOP stats are good; his in-pocket stats are other-worldly.
It's not that Ward is *better* when he's outside the pocket. It's that, when he does something good outside the pocket, there appears to be a real impact on the defense -- which makes sense, because his magic acts are just agonizing for the other team.
Some numbers: Ward has made an outside the pocket play with positive WPA (i.e. a "successful" play) on 22 different drives this year.Miami has scored TDs on 13 of them, FGs on 3, 1 turnover on downs, 2 INTS (both in red zone) and 3 punts.So basically 19/22 of those drives scored or could've easily.
Moreover, all 6 of the drives that didn't end in points came in the first halves of the last two games (VT & Cal). In the 2H of those games:TD, TD, TD, TD, TD, TD
And keep in mind, those OOP plays aren't all big plays -- just are just turning a sack int a 2-yard gain. But consistently it seems to frustrate defenses beyond just that 1 play.So the lesson isn't so much "keep contain" as "have a short memory" with Cam.