forums

Cam Coleman

Advertisement
E1k said:
He’s closer to jj than most people think imo. Jj character make up is probably what pushes him over the top. But just talent and skills? Its like julio and aj green
Click to expand...
he’s had awful QB play which hasn’t picked up his recognition. Kinda like Pickens when he was at jawja didn’t play in a WR friendly offense… he know is and he’s showing he’s one of the best WRs in the league now
 
TexasCane90 said:
he’s had awful QB play which hasn’t picked up his recognition. Kinda like Pickens when he was at jawja didn’t play in a WR friendly offense… he know is and he’s showing he’s one of the best WRs in the league now
Click to expand...
I think thats my comp for him too..he hasn’t shown loser tendencies like Pickens tho from what i have seen
 
How much are these signed to these shoe brands for? Lol Adidas/nike are paying the schools like <$20M TOTAL for just the entire apparrell deal. They aren't paying these FOOTBALL players > $250k even. There would be absolutely zero return on investment for the vast majority. **** I'd bet these non Qbs aren't even getting $50k from Nike/Adidas. And you're gunna tell me if you offer them $50-100k more in NIL they'd say no cause of a shoe deal? lmao.

Having said that unless we get a cheaper QB (in which case I don't think Coleman would even want to pick us), I think it just makes more sense to go a slightly cheaper route. We have a lot of young WR talent. We absolutely need an experienced outside deep threat. But we don't need a guy that'll command >$1M imo.
 
Advertisement
Rellyrell said:
I’m going to assume either the admin don’t know or they thought a bag would suffice.
Click to expand...
If Miami is willing to go after the best players in the portal then they better be ready to find a way to cut ties with adidas asap.
If Nike signs player we want then it’s gonna be a problem considering that about 65% percent of the p4 schools are Nike.
 
Cribby said:
I wouldn’t spend what he wants . You can get two good wr’s for that.
Click to expand...
We can get either Rutgers WR, and two starting LB for that money.

I still like all those names I listed in the WR1 thread.

Coleman too expensive.

Marsh is cheaper and honestly 98% the same wr. So obviously go for him over Coleman if we wanna spend big.

I think either Rutgers or Clemson WR would be cheaper than those 2 at least. And any of these 4 would be my primary target.

After them you have the mid-high end of Jayce Brown and Omarion Miller.

The maybe a bit lower end you have McMillan from Buffalo, He sticks from Ohio, Singleton from USF…

And there are likely a bunch more not super proven talented guys as well.

But I think we want a senior outside deep threat. I don’t think it needs to be like a 6’3” guy. Height/weight wasn’t what I’m concerned with as much as being a proven deep threat
 
Advertisement
Calinative said:
We can get either Rutgers WR, and two starting LB for that money.

I still like all those names I listed in the WR1 thread.

Coleman too expensive.

Marsh is cheaper and honestly 98% the same wr. So obviously go for him over Coleman if we wanna spend big.

I think either Rutgers or Clemson WR would be cheaper than those 2 at least. And any of these 4 would be my primary target.

After them you have the mid-high end of Jayce Brown and Omarion Miller.

The maybe a bit lower end you have McMillan from Buffalo, He sticks from Ohio, Singleton from USF…

And there are likely a bunch more not super proven talented guys as well.

But I think we want a senior outside deep threat. I don’t think it needs to be like a 6’3” guy. Height/weight wasn’t what I’m concerned with as much as being a proven deep threat
Click to expand...
I love Marsh.
 
Cane30 said:
He isn't worth this kind of money, particularly. We have young talent. Their are other veteran's that will have his production for much less. Are those Texas schools all Nike schools? They can pay over $2 million for him. I am back to Nick Marsh.
Click to expand...
We don't have any "young talent" anywhere close to Coleman. Toney for sure, but he's a completely different type of receiver. Moore and Upshaw did look good for freshman, but again, nowhere near Coleman's level. Trader...nah. We should be about done with that experiment. Won't see the field next year.

I agree that Coleman probably isn't worth that kind of money, but he would be a massive upgrade over anybody we have playing his position. By the way, I really like what I see from Moore and Upshaw. They are going to do good things for us, but they aren't Coleman.
 
Back
Top