The NFL once suspended someone for four games because someone was "more likely than not generally aware of deflated footballs", with a physics law being present right in front of their face confirming the measurements in the footballs via simple math.Ah yes the NFL the pinnacle of morality
If this was Arch Manning it wouldn’t be going this way
UFL 1st round draft pick!
Dallas Renegades need a QB.
Yes!Would you draft him for UFL?
Is his next move WWE at this point
They need name recognition and storylines. He won't last until 2nd pick.Would you draft him for UFL?
But don’t you have to be or have been a player in the NFL first to be covered by the NFLPA?
View attachment 365977
Got it… makes sense. So the other side is they let him in the draft and no one selects him and he’s out. As long as they don’t come together (by owners or leagues direction) and say no one can/should select him then that would be collusion?Not necessarily
Unions may have collectively-bargained for some provisions that impact job APPLICANTS. Thus, it MIGHT be argued that if the NFL is "selectively" applying rules to prevent an individual from "applying for" a job in football, that the NFLPA just might be the correct organization to assert itself so that the player COULD apply for (and possibly get a job with) an NFL team.
Thus allowing Sorsby to become a player and NFLPA member.
It's a bit attenuated, but I believe that's the argument being made. Trying to remember **** from my Labor Law class 30 years ago.
Got it… makes sense. So the other side is they let him in the draft and no one selects him and he’s out. As long as they don’t come together (by owners or leagues direction) and say no one can/should select him then that would be collusion?