Bowl or no bowl?

Sure why not, I want a bowel game rematch against mid tenn..
Hate this team but actually enjoy watching a few of the youngins
get their feet wet
 
Advertisement
Usually id like to see us get a bowl game because of the extra practices but with this staff and how bad they are i think its best for recruiting that kids see the least amount possible the games being on bally’s sports has had to of bolstered recruiting lets hope the clemson game isnt prime time and we can get out of this season without giving these recruits any ideas
THIS GUY AND @rok NEED TO BE BANDED*. what kind of porster roots for loses and folding the program? dyck sucking, dyck taking f@ggots
 
THIS GUY AND @rok NEED TO BE BANDED*. what kind of porster roots for loses and folding the program? dyck sucking, dyck taking f@ggots
The guy has a point. Our practices are a bloodbath and there's no telling how many torn ACLs would occur with 15 bowl practices added to the docket. Assuming that Clemson is a loss, the best case scenario is a feel-good win against Pitt (our first win at home since...can't remember) and then we don't receive an invitation to a humiliating bowl game in Shreveport or Boise and focus on recruiting instead.
 
Best case scenario is we go to a bowl but still fire Addae and Gattis right after the regular season
 
THIS GUY AND @rok NEED TO BE BANDED*. what kind of porster roots for loses and folding the program? dyck sucking, dyck taking f@ggots
And for the record @rsa coral gables demanding that someone is banned because you disagree with them is more indicative of *****made tendencies than humbly requesting that football gets dropped at Miami. Does anyone disagree?
 
Advertisement
THIS GUY AND @rok NEED TO BE BANDED*. what kind of porster roots for loses and folding the program? dyck sucking, dyck taking f@ggots
Judge Ok GIF by truTV’s Those Who Can’t
 
And for the record @rsa coral gables demanding that someone is banned because you disagree with them is more indicative of *****made tendencies than humbly requesting that football gets dropped at Miami. Does anyone disagree?
run a poll (or someone else run a poll) to see who wins. the poll should read: which is more indicated of *****made tendencies, (a) a f@ggot that advocates for folding and dropping the program because we suck or (b) a CIS member who advocates for banning a f@ggot that advocates for folding and dropping the program.

i cannot imagine a true fan would ever call for folding and dropping the program. let me think? you left at halftime of the FSU game, correct? nah. you didn't even go. you a f@ggot, correct?

spare me the *****made tendencies and support the f@cking team rather than call for its obliteration. and no bowl game? given how much the human beings (players, coaches, admin etc.) sacrifice, you don't think they'd like a bowl game? we don't need the additional 15 practices.

you've lost your woman card. you are done.
 
And for the record @rsa coral gables demanding that someone is banned because you disagree with them is more indicative of *****made tendencies than humbly requesting that football gets dropped at Miami. Does anyone disagree?

run a poll (or someone else run a poll) to see who wins. the poll should read: which is more indicated of *****made tendencies, (a) a f@ggot that advocates for folding and dropping the program because we suck or (b) a CIS member who advocates for banning a f@ggot that advocates for folding and dropping the program.

i cannot imagine a true fan would ever call for folding and dropping the program. let me think? you left at halftime of the FSU game, correct? nah. you didn't even go. you a f@ggot, correct?

spare me the *****made tendencies and support the f@cking team rather than call for its obliteration. and no bowl game? given how much the human beings (players, coaches, admin etc.) sacrifice, you don't think they'd like a bowl game? we don't need the additional 15 practices.

you've lost your woman card. you are done.

I'm not opposed to this idea, though we'll need to clean up the language you suggest @rsa coral gables. Public poll. Open 7 days. Two options:

Which is more indicative of softness:
(1) posting about banning a poster from CIS for starting threads advocating for the disbandment of UM football; or
(2) actually posting threads advocating for the disbandment of UM football?

I'll run this poll, but only on the condition that the loser is permanently banned from CIS. I STRONGLY suspect @rsa coral gables will have ZERO problems with these terms, but @rok is currently serving a week the CIS gulag, so we'll have to wait for his response.
 
Advertisement
I'm not opposed to this idea, though we'll need to clean up the language you suggest @rsa coral gables. Public poll. Open 7 days. Two options:

Which is more indicative of softness:
(1) posting about banning a poster from CIS for starting threads advocating for the disbandment of UM football; or
(2) actually posting threads advocating for the disbandment of UM football?

I'll run this poll, but only on the condition that the loser is permanently banned from CIS. I STRONGLY suspect @rsa coral gables will have ZERO problems with these terms, but @rok is currently serving a week the CIS gulag, so we'll have to wait for his response.

@rok is in CIS gulag? what's the offense? failure to swallow again?

the poll should read: which is more indicated of *****made tendencies, (a) a f@ggot that advocates for folding and dropping the program because we suck or (b) a CIS member who advocates for banning a f@ggot that advocates for folding and dropping the program
 
@rok is in CIS gulag? what's the offense? failure to swallow?

the poll should read: which is more indicated of *****made tendencies, (a) a f@ggot that advocates for folding and dropping the program because we suck or (b) a CIS member who advocates for banning a f@ggot that advocates for folding and dropping the program

My wording. That part is not negotiable. It's a yes or it's a no, my friend.
 
Back
Top