Big game Mark Richt

[CanesAreAble]

If you can build a good OL and stack on Sfla talent a spread is ideal. But without that OL it won't be any better than now.

You can't run much of anything with a bad OL.

Nope. But I meant that more as Sfla doesn't produce great OL to recruit consistently. We could get all the skills positions we ever needed here, but we would have to be able to go elsewhere to get OL if we really wanted the spread to work here.

Are you saying that doesn't apply to pro style?

 

[F-MarioCristobal]

If you can build a good OL and stack on Sfla talent a spread is ideal. But without that OL it won't be any better than now.

You can't run much of anything with a bad OL.

Nope. But I meant that more as Sfla doesn't produce great OL to recruit consistently. We could get all the skills positions we ever needed here, but we would have to be able to go elsewhere to get OL if we really wanted the spread to work here.

Are you saying that doesn't apply to pro style?

No. But that's why we are where we are at right now. We have to run every play out of a shot gun because our OL is bad. Spread relies that much more on a good OL. Look at the eagles right now, running a spread, bad OL/ bad results. Then a team like New England, pro style and a bad OL and still winning. Same goes for Denver. (could be bad comparisons because they also have the best QBs in the NFL) So, a team like the Falcons is another example. Terrible OL but they still get it done.

 

[CanesAreAble]

No. But that's why we are where we are at right now. We have to run every play out of a shot gun because our OL is bad. Spread relies that much more on a good OL. Look at the eagles right now, running a spread, bad OL/ bad results. Then a team like New England, pro style and a bad OL and still winning. Same goes for Denver. (could be bad comparisons because they also have the best QBs in the NFL) So, a team like the Falcons is another example. Terrible OL but they still get it done.

I don't agree with this.

In fact I think it's the exact opposite.

 

[ncncanes]

Strong had 2 good years at Louisville and beat ONE ranked team over those two years
- Charlie is a little better than Al... a little

 

[UMFarArcher]

Strong had 2 good years at Louisville and beat ONE ranked team over those two years
- Charlie is a little better than Al... a little

Even a blind squirrel . . .

 

[harphong]

Strong had 2 good years at Louisville and beat ONE ranked team over those two years
- Charlie is a little better than Al... a little

I am off the skrong train. no richt. no mario, no **** Midas kiffin, no tooberville....

then I will follow with a crazy touch of ice Harris for interim hc, if alfraud gets novembered, possible oc under a decent hire. I think nice is ninja-ing his way to bigger n better things for himself sooner than later.

in the off chance alfraud gets kiffnd, ice is best internal interim hc option we got and the kids would play hard for him.

I wont go as crazy to suggest he be made hc, but I would like something good for him.

 

[FullyERicht]

I mean you have team that is a run heavy team with a mediocre QB and they run Saban's exact defense.

It played into Sabans hands.

If you'll note the teams that give him problems use a ton of misdirection and perimeter running on offense, and his team wilt against small fast defenses. That's why Ole **** owns him now, b/c they feature an incredible small but incredibly fast front 7.

 

[DiegoCane]

If you can build a good OL and stack on Sfla talent a spread is ideal. But without that OL it won't be any better than now.

You can't run much of anything with a bad OL.

Nope. But I meant that more as Sfla doesn't produce great OL to recruit consistently. We could get all the skills positions we ever needed here, but we would have to be able to go elsewhere to get OL if we really wanted the spread to work here.

Are you saying that doesn't apply to pro style?

No. But that's why we are where we are at right now. We have to run every play out of a shot gun because our OL is bad. Spread relies that much more on a good OL. Look at the eagles right now, running a spread, bad OL/ bad results. Then a team like New England, pro style and a bad OL and still winning. Same goes for Denver. (could be bad comparisons because they also have the best QBs in the NFL) So, a team like the Falcons is another example. Terrible OL but they still get it done.

In what world is New England a conventional "pro-style" offense?

 

[BLUE PHI CANE]

LOL @ some of these old post