Banner

a banner that supports jim kelly is good. a banner that supports carter hucks is good. a banner doing either of those while taking a stab at anyone is classless.

The banner doesn't even "support" Carter. It uses his name as a cheerleader for good PR. There is no get well soon Carter, good luck Carter, etc. It's a banner flown for the sole purpose of making the school look better to those who are naive enough to not realize, "hey how does that support the kid?"

You're way off. It wasn't the university.

You said in the other thread you didn't know who flew it.

If I was in your shoes I would take the positive view point as well. But to think someone out there isn't using this as a marketing ploy for the u is just silly.
 
Advertisement
The only reason canesfam flew the banner is because they wanted to oppose the Fire Golden crew.

Which one is more disgraceful?

the one that used jim kelly's name to promote an agenda.

As opposed to the one who uses a child's? I'm with problem on this one. Banner wasn't flown to support the kid, straight power move by those who are pro Golden and staff. A **** good one at that. Make the anti Golden guys look bad and promote a nice story. Either way there was an agenda.
Yup, because Carter's family didn't know who flew it.

Sorry DHucks, But they didn't do it "for" Carter. They did it in his name, w/o your permission.

Jessie Hucks ‏@ItIsJessie 1h1 hour ago
Thank "U" to whomever flew the banner for Carter! He's doing chemo and wearing his Kelly tough shirt! #go canes! Oh! And watching!
 
Real Americans populate the WEZ. Not like the chickenschit red lovers that infest this place.
 
I hope you guys are proud of yourselves. DHucks especially.

Instead of protecting your son you're out here talking **** to people who were upset that they'd use his illness to push their agenda without even consulting you a little bit.

Good luck to Carter, I hope he got a smile out of seeing his name up there. Hopefully when he beats what ails him he doesn't look back and realize how so many people used what he was going through as a megaphone for their ignorance and to win favor with the program.
 
anything other then great job or excellent makes you a slurper. end of story. he needs to go
 
Using the kid as good PR=classy, but mentioning Kelly=disgraceful, rude, immature. You can't have it like that. They are both one in the same just with different purposes.

Dummies don't get that. And they never will.

So it's only fine if it's fire Al?

It's fine if it's either. I'm a free speech advocate. But don't make it seem like there's no PR angle to the nice banner because no one with a brain buys it.

I don't like hypocrites, and the people whining about one PR message as distasteful while lauding the other PR message are hypocrites.

if you want a "fire al" banner, then fly a "fire al" banner. if you want a jim kelly banner, then fly a jim kelly banner. they should be exclusive of each other. that's the only problem i have. sure, the carter banner could've been a pro-golden shill (i think that notion is a little bit of a reach), but they didn't say it and tag on "save golden" or something like that on it. there's a fundamental difference and you idiots refuse to see it.

Instead they signed it "-Carter" Completely inappropriate. Absolutely horrible. Glad DHucks wasn't offended, but that's all AFTER THE FACT that his son's name was exploited.
 
It's always interesting to see how people react when they are backed into a corner.
 
Much worse are the people who want the team to lose every game on the schedule so that AG is fired. How do you think the players feel about being used as sacrifcious lambs for the fans to feel they achieved their goal?

Probably a little more upset about being part of a talented team that will likely graduate without ever winning a bowl game.
You know what a player said? They don't like the coaches but they "hate" the fans. Here you go.

We are both assuming so don't play that card.

Im not really disagreeing with you just saying I don't think it's as much one way as you are saying. That's all.
With all due respect, I am not assuming. My son just graduated and is a friend with a few player on the offense. Just relaying.

That's great for your son. I know a guy that hangs with one of our Sr. linemen all the time. He say's the exact opposite of what your son is quoting his source as saying. He said that if things had gone skeewampus vs Vag tek the players would have basically quit on the corches.

I trust my source more than I trust yours and I'm sure you feel the same.

So at this point it's all hearsay and 3rd party speculation isn't it?

These corches are horrible. That's the bottom ******* line.
 
Advertisement
I know that correlation /= causation but we were schitty schitty diaper football before that WEZ banner flew.

Call it motivation. Call it fate.

Results speak for themselves.
 
Advertisement
Banner ignited Golden to let the savages loose. It did its job.

That is so funny that you think the stupid banner changed Golden's coaching. Trying so hard to feel like you actually did something positive with your juvenile move.
 
Banner ignited Golden to let the savages loose. It did its job.

That is so funny that you think the stupid banner changed Golden's coaching. Trying so hard to feel like you actually did something positive with your juvenile move.

The banner was a big investment for some die hard fans like pimp. He donated his hard earned savings towards it. Since the team is winning now and they can't seem to get rid of golden or get all the players who "hate" golden to quit on him and lose out, they might as well take credit for the wins.
 
Back
Top