forums

Athletic article on football spending

P-Tizzle

P-Tizzle

All American
Premium
Joined
Aug 1, 2020
Messages
10,494
1765935612693.png
 
Advertisement
P-Tizzle said:
Post a link? These poor bums on CIS can’t afford $2/mo for ad free; you think they can afford a subscription to the Athletic?
Click to expand...
Ironically, the actual homeless people who go to public libraries to crank their hogs in front of the computers have access to The Athletic through the library NYT subscription. Maybe we CISsies should change up our strategy.
 
Advertisement
P-Tizzle said:
Post a link? These poor bums on CIS can’t afford $2/mo for ad free; you think they can afford a subscription to the Athletic?
Click to expand...
I thought we were all rich ballers here on CIS. My Platinum AmEx gives a credit for certain digital subscriptions, and since The Athletic is included under NYT, it’s included.
 
According to the article, we also have $78.1 million in football revenue, so we spend everything we bring in. Georgia has $133.7 million in revenue for that $68.9 million spend. They’re cheaping out on Kirby.
 
Advertisement
tuition costs alone are probably like $5M for us. Double that for standard room and board. Coaches salaries are what probably $15M? That's what $25M in expenses before even accounting for equipment and facilities and all the other employees and medical stuff necessary.
Nil is probably $25-30M this yr. But I don't think that was included in this given at that time schools weren't allowed to pay directly.
 
Back
Top