Some things from the Frenk letter thst caught my eye:
I want to make clear that the Board of Trustees and I, as president, recognize the essential part of our brand and reputation derived from athletics and we are fully committed to building championship-caliber teams at the U.
1. ‘Recognize the essential part of our brand and reputation’? So we don’t actually want to win for its own sake, just because it’s part of our brand?
2. We’re ‘committed to building championship-caliber teams’? Why didn’t he just write that we expect to win titles? Because our commitment is what counts, not actually winning. We’re ‘trying.’ Trying what? To build, not to win. Build what? Championship-caliber teams, not champions.
I assume he wrote this carefully. It’s very weak.
/shouldn’t he capitalize ‘president’, btw.?
We can either be disrupted, or we can play a role in strategically shaping the course of disruption.
lol wut?
I have decided to increase the involvement from my senior leadership team to chart a way forward. Rudy Fernandez … and Joe Echevarria … will augment my own direct engagement with the athletics director by facilitating seamless alignment between the Board of Trustees, my entire administration, and the athletics department.
’augment’
’direct’
’facilitating’
’seamless alignment’
’entire administration’
So he’s making this change because there isn’t currently seamless alignment between his entire administration, the BOT and the AD? That’s quite an admission. Who is this disaligned person? Why not just fire that person? What will the seamless alignment facilitators actually do? And how will we know if we achieve a state of seamless alignment? Does that requite some sort of outcome achievement, like winning? Or just everyone agreeing that our commitment to building championship-caliber teams’ is strong?
At the U, time and again, we have proven that excellence in academics and excellence in athletics are not mutually exclusive.
Why write this? Did anyone suggest they are ’mutually exclusive’? Why would anyone think that? Teams win titles every year. Who is he responding to with this?
The obvious answer is this is an admission against interest. He is telling us what he really thinks with this unprompted defensive blurb.
He thinks excellence in academics and excellence in athletics are, in fact, mostly mutually exclusive, and that is his defense of the **** performance of his AD. He’s saying bad athletics doesn’t matter, and we shouldn’t care, because anything else would run counter to our goal of excellence in academics. He is taking pride in our **** AD. It’s a validator to him of his belief set.