Off-Topic Archeological Finds

Fascinating. To me at least.

 
Advertisement
What a joke.

They found a handful of teeth. And then they go on to spin a fairytale yarn about the remote past based on that handful of teeth. This is not science.

We're supposed to believe that a piece of a jaw with a few teeth - is the basis for the Gigantopithicus - they've actually created a real-size giant ape - and present that as science.

Look it up. That thing the photos will show - came from just a few teeth in a small segment of a jawbone.

Where these supposed hominid teeth were found - are dated. Look at the terrain. Lots of loose debris on eroded layers of earth. The teeth weren't found all together - some could have been in other layers and eventually washed down to lower layers - where they were actually found.

Here's my critical thinking on this "evolution" boulschitt: Evolution requires a steady-state environment to enable a slow altering of a species to a higher level species.

And if this evolution crap is a working process - why do oak tree leaves today look just like fossilized oak tree leaves? Or monkees? Apes? If everything evolves - we shouldn't have most species.

And we don't. 99.5% of all species that have ever existed - never did evolve - they just went extinct. No evolution - extinction.

Problem is - all geology is NOT steady-state, it's all catastrophic. Look at the Geological Eras. They have lots of geological eras - separated and defined by catastrophic events. Look at the C/T line. The Cretaceous/Tertiary line. Major catastrophic change - sudden like.

These anthropologists and geologists once they get about 10,000 years ago and older - I find about as reliable as Ancient Astronaut Theorists.

FOS.
 
Fascinating. To me at least.


Curious. So the Egyptians used hydraulics - for 20,000 pound stones. Because these pyramids were on the banks of an ancient river.

That doesn't address how the Megaliths of the Americas were cut and transported. Nor the ones in the other land-bound areas of the Middle East.

Gobekii-. Stonehenge. Baabek Stone - 1,242 TONS.

Point being - those Egyptologists are just lazy. Just because a river was nearby - doesn't explain a workable means of transporting huge stones around the world.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top