The Committe only truly "Values" H2H when the teams they are comparing are within 3 spots of eachother. The committee had us 8 spots apart from ND just on the resume, which is supposedly supposed to heavily value SOR and Top25 wins. So the H2H never came into place when doing that seeding between us and ND because we were too far apart just on the metric based ranking.
However this week I think louisville likely would fall to around 18-20 (would be a 3-5 fall) due to an OT loss, which would be within 3 spots of where we are. So if that is the case and we are closely rated just on the metrics like SOS+SOR+Game Control+Top25 wins (the metrics the committee looks at), then I think they would then value the H2H matchup. This is why Texas is clearly above OU, they also have similar metrics. It's also why UVA was above Louisville. But honestly UVA has even worse metrics than Louisville does. I think just by record they were slotted highly as their baseline.
Now it IS possible for Louisville to say drop far enough to where that H2H gets essentially devalued in the rankings. They actually are NOT all that great by most of the metrics listed on ESPN (I think committe uses slightly different ratings). SOR UL is 26, FPI 36, SOS 63, Game Control 38... Meanwhile we rank SOR 17, 13 FPI, 39 SOS, 10 Game control. Notre Dame ranks SOR 13, 5 FPI, 30 SOS, 9 Game Control. So it is definitely possible that Louisville does drop a few spots behind us and that H2H doesn't play the deciding factor. Tough to say. And probably the fact that UVA also lost likely makes it more likely Louisville is behind us. I just wouldn't count on it. We'll see. I think if they do rank USF in the top 25 we probably will rank ahead of Louisville (because that would be another top 25 win for us which is more highly valued).....
I could see that being:
12. BYU
13. Utah
14. Vanderbilt
15. GTech
16. Miami
17. USC
18. Michigan
19. UVA
20. Louisville
21. Pitt
22. UTenn
23. Iowa
24. USF
25. SMU/Cinci/JMU/idk