classiccane12
Freshman
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2018
- Messages
- 384
I think it's ridiculous to suggest that any school would willingly be cheap towards its football program. All of the data shows that spending on football is a worthwhile investment where schools routinely earn astronomical returns. This is especially true @ MIA where the football program has given the university so much. So the question is why would the administration literally bite the hand that has fed it if it actually has a choice?
It's more that UM has been cheap on everything they do. There can be a fine line between cheap and frugal, but Miami has not traditionally been free spenders with the exception of a few things like shalalas hospital, etc. They think they can cut corners and find value in more cost friendly options.
Problem is that's not the best strategy necessarily for long term success, especially in football where it is a spending arms-race, and it has caught up to them. They thought we can go affordable on coaches, still be respectable, maybe win acc coastal every once in awhile, save money while still getting a nice ACC paycheck. It has has caught up to them and in other areas of the university as well. You play for second place, while everyone else plays for first, and you will finish last. They continue to apply the same strategy to get out of the problem, which they have been doing for 15 years, to the results you see now.