forums

Am I the only one that felt Indiana in the first half

Advertisement
canes_226 said:
The problem with Dawson is we need to be losing for him to open up the playbook. The Mario ball worked against the other teams but you saw in ole miss the same thing. Why we didn’t run more stretch to the outside right is mind boggling too
Click to expand...
On Fletcher's first touchdown we ran off tackle. We definitely had leverage. We were more effectively when we spread them some. Should have play actioned out of our bunch sets in the first half. Can't go 0 for 6 on 3rd down in first half.
 
After watching the game last night it made me realize what a bunch of delusional retards the SEC fans are who came up with the theory that Cignetti was hacking the interwebz to beat people. They were just as physical as us, their skill players were elusive, they tackled better than us, they didn’t make crucial mistakes, and we still had a chance to win. That’s just a physical, disciplined, veteran team with playmakers
 
RozayCane said:
Knew exactly what were running?

In my time watching football not sure I’ve ever seen anything like it.

I’m trying not to do the loser **** and blame cheating.. but they literally knew what seem like every play we called.

I made a comment in the game thread that we should stop sending plays into the headset.. wonder if there were adjustments made at half to send in plays.

And before anyone else says it.. Yes.. Dawson and the blocking didn’t do us a whole lot of favors either.
Click to expand...
My wife, who never watches football, was predicting what we’d run.
 
The U is back to work said:
it’s unexplainable what that team does and why it works to perfection with 0 breakdown.
Click to expand...

THIS.

They play perfect football but their tslent level doesnt mstch. If they won nail biters every game, you would say they are disciplined and lucky. But they were BLOWING OUT teams with far more talent.

They know what you are doing so often it feels like they are cheating, but they play too clean too. Some will say. its just coaching or discipline. Thats bull**** 60+ year old coaacjes with fcs rejects dont just transform into worrld beaters over night.

They are doing something WAY out of thee ordinary. If they arre not cheaating, they have found a ground breaking way to use AI. Used right AI has powrr to upend industries like this. Anaalysis, teaching methods, prediction models, metaphysics.

Most of ypu have no idea how powerful it really is and what those machines really know. The secret sauce is in tying together seemingly unrelated fields and patterns.

Cignetti maay have opened Pandora's box. One thing for sure. His team plays like it
 
Sitting in zone against 3-4 man routes that don’t go past 5 yards and 4 different run plays ain’t hard to stop.

Don’t forget they were also never on the field. Their offense held the ball for almost 20 minutes, bc Heatherman refused to play press and gave them a free 5-8 yards whenever they wanted it.
 
Advertisement
1000041818.gif
 
Advertisement
CanesFP said:
Surprised they were stunting into the A gap? No. Sitting on your couch, you knew we'd run there.

Surprised our oline couldn't move them? Yes. Undersized dline moving laterally and you can't move them? Almost like we didn't practice how we'd handle their stunting.

Heck, it didn't surprise me that it took dawson until halftime to adjust. That's been him all year. Dawson's flaws seem to be in video study and game planning. He often seems to mix up his notes and has his "what not to do" sheet get mixed in with his "do this" stuff.

But why did it take an entire half of football to stop giving them 8 yard outs. It took an entire half to finally come up and play press.
Click to expand...

One of the biggest arguments for sending Dawson upstairs at least for the first half... he doesn't seem to be able to see the big picture from the sidelines...
 
Back
Top