I think you walked into a thread celebrating 10 players on achieving ACC honors and proceeded to facetiously comment sarcastically on our supposed lack of talent (notwithstanding 10 selections). I pointed out we had the same number and comparable quality of selections as the Duke team you cited in your post. You then claimed Duke had that many ACC selections because their coaches maximized talent (and implying Miami only had 10 selections because our coaches underutilized our talent).
So do ACC selections demonstrate a level of talent on the roster, or coaches putting their players in position to succeed? Or are you suggesting when Duke has (incredibly) 10 All ACC selections it's because of great coaching, but when Miami has (only) 10 All ACC selections it's because our coaches suck?