I edited my original. It seems the its linked to revenue sharing and he can still do 3rd party?No, they can't. NIL rights are personal to the athlete and no university can take that from an athlete regardless of what these agreements say.
I edited my original. It seems the its linked to revenue sharing and he can still do 3rd party?No, they can't. NIL rights are personal to the athlete and no university can take that from an athlete regardless of what these agreements say.
They can’t stop him from getting paid at Miami.Can't they keep his NIL while he plays at Miami? At worst he gets nothing besides the money Duke paid for rights. But he still plays at Miami?
Having his NIL rights doesn't mean he has to play for them?
This Heitner guy is more useful than Bauman
I edited my original. It seems the its linked to revenue sharing and he can still do 3rd party?
****, I was having a great day too
I agree. But they have have some value as far as rights retention goes, at least as a bargaining tool.We don't have NIL caselaw but we do have employment law and these NIL "contracts" are toilet paper b/c they are employment agreements with another name; they demand employee concessions without being employment contracts. This is why these NIL "contracts" won't stand legal muster.
Can he play punt protect?
Harvey Mother****ing Specter. IYKYK
So is a half eaten Snickers.This Heitner guy is more useful than Bauman
I would imagine Heitner would argue to the judge it needs to be an expedited ruling given the fact he has a short time period to enroll at his new school in time for the Spring semester otherwise he would be unduly harmed in that he would miss a semester.They work quick.
Or get his sister to transfer to Miami to play soccer and make her the richest college soccer player.Easy. Pay him lump sum on day after his two year term expires under the Duke collective contract.
If we can't pay him RevShare money until the court case is resolved, does that mean Duke still has to pay him?Barry is wrong as always.
If he’s enrolled at Miami tomorrow, he can take part in spring practice.
What they probably can’t do is pay him to be there in the short-term without a ruling which I’m sure he can claim and get it thru pretty easily assuming Duke stops paying.
These guys have zero leverage.
The real difference is there was actual tampering with Williams; hence his agent dropping him. With Mensah, Miami went through the agent, which is how it is supposed to work.
Believe it starts in March. That one is different in that Wisky is suing Miami not Lucas.What’s the latest with the Wisconsin lawsuit? That BS get thrown out yet. Good precursor to the Mensah deal.
Can’t count the amount of times I’ve been sent this by my Duke buddiesyawn at thinking these “ contracts” will be enforced . I need more Twitter lawyers to tell me I’m wrong for the hundredth time. No judge wants to be in these waters.