Yeah, Malik was streaky at best today. He didn’t make any good throws actually.
That one throw to 18 from one sideline to the other in zone was great. Other than that he was pretty much what I expect against a weak opponent.
Yeah, Malik was streaky at best today. He didn’t make any good throws actually.
Should have kept it a few times which would have been better runs. Still thinks he doesn’t completely understand the situation wellThere wasn’t anything exceptional about Malik & you don’t have a clue if you think he was masterful in the read option.
I’m at a loss as to how anyone could watch that game and think anything other than “Malik Rosier playing against overmatched Group of 5 team.”
Should have kept it a few times which would have been better runs. Still thinks he doesn’t completely understand the situation well
He be guessing out there lol. I’ll give credit where it’s due though, made some good throws on the 3rd down when the defense was getting its *** kicked in the 3rd quarter and he ran the ball tough imo. Generally moved the ball well for the entire game outside a few drives. Good game in the red zone for the offense as wellIt’s clear he doesn’t. He consistently makes the most idiotic reads
He made 52% of his passes, AGAINST A GLORIFIED HIGH SCHOOL TEAM. I guess for him that is playing well. You are right.75% of this board actively roots for Miami to lose and Rosier to look bad so he'll get pulled.
It ****es people off when he plays well, so they try to nitpick and explaIn away his success.
It's just pathetic. Call him **** when he plays like ****, but when he plays well at least have the balls to admit it.
But hey, 75% of CIS thinks its still 1987 so its not really surprising
He be guessing out there lol. I’ll give credit where it’s due though, made some good throws on the 3rd down when the defense was getting its *** kicked in the 3rd quarter and he ran the ball tough imo. Generally moved the ball well for the entire game outside a few drives. Good game in the red zone for the offense as well
He be guessing out there lol. I’ll give credit where it’s due though, made some good throws on the 3rd down when the defense was getting its *** kicked in the 3rd quarter and he ran the ball tough imo. Generally moved the ball well for the entire game outside a few drives. Good game in the red zone for the offense as well
Exactly what I thought.
That one throw to 18 from one sideline to the other in zone was great. Other than that he was pretty much what I expect against a weak opponent.
We would have won that game at least 56-10 had Jaquan Johnson not been injured and replaced with Bobby Knowles.
And people would still be bltching.
He be guessing out there lol. I’ll give credit where it’s due though, made some good throws on the 3rd down when the defense was getting its *** kicked in the 3rd quarter and he ran the ball tough imo. Generally moved the ball well for the entire game outside a few drives. Good game in the red zone for the offense as well
75% of this board actively roots for Miami to lose and Rosier to look bad so he'll get pulled.
It ****es people off when he plays well, so they try to nitpick and explaIn away his success.
It's just pathetic. Call him **** when he plays like ****, but when he plays well at least have the balls to admit it.
But hey, 75% of CIS thinks its still 1987 so its not really surprising
Weak opponent? You got to be kidding me. Toledo may possibly play in the MAC championship game, again. Now the CornSUCKER'S losing at home to mighty Troy could thought of as a weak opponent.
Weak opponent? You got to be kidding me. Toledo may possibly play in the MAC championship game, again. Now the CornSUCKER'S losing at home to mighty Troy could thought of as a weak opponent.