- Joined
- May 14, 2016
- Messages
- 39,607
I'd prefer the 9 over the 8+2, simply because it does more to offset the ridiculousness that is the cross-divisional scheduling.
Sick of teams like VT having an advantage just due to the fact that their cross-divisional opponent is a cupcake.
How does going to 9 games change that?
I'd prefer the 9 over the 8+2, simply because it does more to offset the ridiculousness that is the cross-divisional scheduling.
Sick of teams like VT having an advantage just due to the fact that their cross-divisional opponent is a cupcake.
How does going to 9 games change that?
It adds another cross division game, increasing the chance that someone beside us will have to play FSU and Clemson (insert whatever really good Atlantic team is in any given year) in the same year.
My opinion on scheduling:
Anyone, anytime, anywhere
That's not how Bama or literally every other elite program does it. Playing more than 1 marquee OOC game is dumb. Even dumber if they move to a 9 game ACC sched.
The Bama model is: 1 good team + 3 easy wins for OOC.
"Anyone, anywhere, anytime" is a relic and is just dumb in modern cfb