forums

ACC Review System

rolodex

rolodex

Recruit
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
89
This is the only information I can find on it: https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...review-center-to-aid-game-officials/84293436/

From what I understand, all reviewable plays go to the review center. Multiple ACC officials apart from officials at the game reviewing the non-fumble fumble. The officiating at the GT game was exceptionally bad also.

Not that its going to change the outcome, but what recourse does UM have for the egregious officiating after the fact? Someone needs to lose their job over this at the ACC.

Also, UM not GT brings in viewership and $. Would think the ACC would protect/promote one of their marquee programs.
 
Advertisement
rolodex said:
what recourse does UM have for the egregious officiating
Click to expand...
Win out and never EVER let the refs decide the game. "Biased officiating" and "legacy media hatred" against the U is a part of wearing our logo--it comes with the territory. How many times have we seen refs decide we were the losers? The phantom PI again tOSU? The countless phantom no-calls for holding against our defense over the years? When and how many times more does this lesson need learning? We lose when we don't dominate and allow the refs to pick their chosen winner--ten times out of ten. Begging for them to help the Canes out is never going to happen. We are hated. They aren't helping those they hate. It's been that way since the beginning and it will always be that way.
 
We lost, the end.

However I've seen the Pac 10 add points a day after a game via review. That review would end the game anyway so by the same logic they should be able to award us the win... Posthumously
 
They ought to look at some of the holding NON-calls which led to points for GT as well. They won’t.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top