A Solution To Our WR Depth

[reidz5]

I just thought of a really good idea in order to accomodate for our atrocious WR depth.

Since we are absolutely loaded at TE, why don't we run lots of two TE sets and use them as receivers? We only have 8 scholarship receivers (assuming Mullins gets in). We can save the bodies of our WR corps by using TE'S more often and going with power running sets. We can afford an injury or two at TE, we cannot at WR.

What do you guys think of this idea? I might write an email to Co-OC Brown if you like the idea.

 

[Lutzboy247]

........think you're a little late, since that's exactly what we are already doing.

 

[deleted1998]

Writing an email is a great idea. Make sure to CC Richt.

Or you could email Pete and ask him to pass along the info.

 

[cflacane2]

I just thought of a really good idea in order to accomodate for our atrocious WR depth.

Since we are absolutely loaded at TE, why don't we run lots of two TE sets and use them as receivers? We only have 8 scholarship receivers (assuming Mullins gets in). We can save the bodies of our WR corps by using TE'S more often and going with power running sets. We can afford an injury or two at TE, we cannot at WR.

What do you guys think of this idea? I might write an email to Co-OC Brown if you like the idea.

You should write the email and send us a copy.

 

[ThomasM]

So we have three quality TEs, and can afford an injury or two there? But 8 WRs means we can't risk losing one?

 

[3G Cane]

Dear OP,

I see your brilliant idea and raise you one. Now, I don't know if you've ever thought of this but perhaps we would be well advised as to deploy the various formations of the triple option in an effort to alleviate this problem you so deftly identify. Please feel free to incorporate my suggestion in the manifesto you pen to our coaches. This just may save the season.

 

[MovingZen]

I just thought of a really good idea in order to accomodate for our atrocious WR depth.

Since we are absolutely loaded at TE, why don't we run lots of two TE sets and use them as receivers? We only have 8 scholarship receivers (assuming Mullins gets in). We can save the bodies of our WR corps by using TE'S more often and going with power running sets. We can afford an injury or two at TE, we cannot at WR.

What do you guys think of this idea? I might write an email to Co-OC Brown if you like the idea.

WR depth is so bad we should run the triple option.. am I rite or am I rite?

 

[FrancisSawyer]

I just thought of a really good idea in order to accomodate for our atrocious WR depth.

Since we are absolutely loaded at TE, why don't we run lots of two TE sets and use them as receivers? We only have 8 scholarship receivers (assuming Mullins gets in). We can save the bodies of our WR corps by using TE'S more often and going with power running sets. We can afford an injury or two at TE, we cannot at WR.

What do you guys think of this idea? I might write an email to Co-OC Brown if you like the idea.

I've got a better idea. Why don't we run the triple option?

 

[TpaBayFlyFisher]

Dear OP,

I see your brilliant idea and raise you one. Now, I don't know if you've ever thought of this but perhaps we would be well advised as to deploy the various formations of the triple option in an effort to alleviate this problem you so deftly identify. Please feel free to incorporate my suggestion in the manifesto you pen to our coaches. This just may save the season.

I would add, since we are loaded at RB, the wing-T would be a solid addition to our base package..............

 

[FrancisSawyer]

I just thought of a really good idea in order to accomodate for our atrocious WR depth.

Since we are absolutely loaded at TE, why don't we run lots of two TE sets and use them as receivers? We only have 8 scholarship receivers (assuming Mullins gets in). We can save the bodies of our WR corps by using TE'S more often and going with power running sets. We can afford an injury or two at TE, we cannot at WR.

What do you guys think of this idea? I might write an email to Co-OC Brown if you like the idea.

WR depth is so bad we should run the triple option.. am I rite or am I rite?

Didn't even see your post till I posted. Great minds.........

 

[MovingZen]

I just thought of a really good idea in order to accomodate for our atrocious WR depth.

Since we are absolutely loaded at TE, why don't we run lots of two TE sets and use them as receivers? We only have 8 scholarship receivers (assuming Mullins gets in). We can save the bodies of our WR corps by using TE'S more often and going with power running sets. We can afford an injury or two at TE, we cannot at WR.

What do you guys think of this idea? I might write an email to Co-OC Brown if you like the idea.

WR depth is so bad we should run the triple option.. am I rite or am I rite?

Didn't even see your post till I posted. Great minds.........

haha.. my man left that one over the plate didn't he?

 

[cflacane2]

Dear OP,

I see your brilliant idea and raise you one. Now, I don't know if you've ever thought of this but perhaps we would be well advised as to deploy the various formations of the triple option in an effort to alleviate this problem you so deftly identify. Please feel free to incorporate my suggestion in the manifesto you pen to our coaches. This just may save the season.

Forget the triple option. Credit to whoopingcane but i think we can run the quadruple option with Gray. We will revolutionize college FB.

 

[Notsince1985]

I thought this was going to be another triple option thread

 

[miamilaw07]

Dear OP,

I see your brilliant idea and raise you one. Now, I don't know if you've ever thought of this but perhaps we would be well advised as to deploy the various formations of the triple option in an effort to alleviate this problem you so deftly identify. Please feel free to incorporate my suggestion in the manifesto you pen to our coaches. This just may save the season.

I would add, since we are loaded at RB, the wing-T would be a solid addition to our base package..............

I played wing-T in HS, I'll get started on a draft email...

 

[ThomasM]

We're far more suited to the flying wedge. I'm pretty sure it was outlawed years ago, but I bet if Richt lobbied hard enough he could have that rule changed by 2023.

Football Players in Flying Wedge Formation Pictures | Getty Images

 

[LustNCanes]

Dear OP,

I see your brilliant idea and raise you one. Now, I don't know if you've ever thought of this but perhaps we would be well advised as to deploy the various formations of the triple option in an effort to alleviate this problem you so deftly identify. Please feel free to incorporate my suggestion in the manifesto you pen to our coaches. This just may save the season.

LMFAO!!

 

[LustNCanes]

Dear OP,

I see your brilliant idea and raise you one. Now, I don't know if you've ever thought of this but perhaps we would be well advised as to deploy the various formations of the triple option in an effort to alleviate this problem you so deftly identify. Please feel free to incorporate my suggestion in the manifesto you pen to our coaches. This just may save the season.

I would add, since we are loaded at RB, the wing-T would be a solid addition to our base package..............

I played wing-T in HS, I'll get started on a draft email...

LOL!!! How about 2 hand touch! That'll solve our problem!

 

[LustNCanes]

It feels great to be a Canes fan, again... Great times are on their way, men!!! Thank God!!

 

[TXCane]

You should skip the letter and apply directly for a staff coaching position

 

[ghost2]

Ima lock this...just because...