forums

A Larranaga interview vs a Golden interview

caneaddict

caneaddict

Senior
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,566
Man listening to Coach L just makes me realize how full of **** Golden is.. I know beating a dead horse whatever, but **** Golden complicates ****.. Coach L is so simple, factual, and transparent. A simple question Joe Rose asked Coach L this morning:

"does your run in the NIT help recruiting?" and coach L says just a simple "yes"

just made me think what a clusterphuck of an answer Golden would turn that into, just simple things like this really standout because truly simplifying things in collegiate/amateur athletics is what the best do.

Sorry but had to mention because Golden really needs to pipe down (literally) and stop complicating everything
 
Advertisement
He even admitted that the early season losses hurt. They didn't play up to snuff.

Golden would've danced around that **** for an hour.
 
Everything that comes out of Folden's mouth is total bull****. I think that's where a lot of the personal hatred towards him comes from with the fan base. Not to mention the fact that he's an incompetent as an HC.
 
De Pinga said:
He even admitted that the early season losses hurt. They didn't play up to snuff.

Golden would've danced around that **** for an hour.
Click to expand...

this is exactly it, Coach L's accountability is genuine, grohldens is filled with backhanded blame and people getting busrolled
 
Nothing really surprising about this comparison. People with successes in life tend to be more self-secure than those who have none.
 
Corch AL is a liar scumbag used car salesman. Coach L is a genuine person and coach. Big difference between these two.
 
larranga hasn't exactly won big either. he is inconsistent. beats top teams then losing to mid-level teams.
 
Advertisement
Golden is a con artist.

His mentor is the greatest con artist of all time. Paterno is still beloved despite harboring a child rapist for years.
 
Back
Top