6 Games In....What Have We Learned

I understand the frustration with the playcalling. But after watching a lot of these games over I really think we ball out with a good o-line that can create holes and pass protect. Changing quarterbacks solved 1/3 of our problems. As far as special teams God help us please!!
 
Advertisement
One correction- Baxa is the kicker, not Badgley. Also, I don't know if FSU had Richts playbook or if his playcalling is that predictable- on first and goal in the 3rd quarter, one of the announcers said, "Richt loves to run QB draws here. " Sure enough, he runs a qb draw and FSU stuffed it. Might need to rethink the strategy when Brock Huard turns into Carnac the Magnificent and can easily predict your plays.

No my friend; I was saying our ST woes were last year as well, w inopportune missed field goals by Badgley and Feagles was equally bad last yr as well.
 
Last edited:
One correction- Baxa is the kicker, not Badgley. Also, I don't know if FSU had Richts playbook or if his playcalling is that predictable- on first and goal in the 3rd quarter, one of the announcers said, "Richt loves to run QB draws here. " Sure enough, he runs a qb draw and FSU stuffed it. Might need to rethink the strategy when Brock Huard turns into Carnac the Magnificent and can easily predict your plays.
Happened a couple weeks ago one a different situation, the announcer literally said what we were going to do and it got stopped. I think this goes back to Richt just thinking if we execute well enough it doesn't matter whether or not they know it is coming
 
Did you fine folks realize that our avg starting drive Saturday was on the 38.5 yard line? That means we had, on avg. 62 yrds to score. That's a phenomenal field position avg. Yet, we didn't do much with it. I need Richt to take off the training wheels and just let it go. We're too buttoned up on offense, imo.

Not disagreeing with a little tune up of the offense, but....
The 38.5 field position number is a little misleading.
Through our first 9 possessions our field position was the 25 yard line.
The next 6 possesions our field po was FSU's 44 where we scored 3 of 6 times, which should have been 4 of 6 without the TD drop/missed kick.
I didn't count the final kneel down possession
If MR had a little JJ in him, it's not a stretch to say we could have scored 5 of our final 7 possessions when we had good starting field position.
 
Here's the stat to digest over 6 games..
125
miami-fl.17.png
Miami (FL) 6 9 200 1 22.22
Rank Team Games Returns Return Yards TDs AVG Punt
 
If they can protect Perry, he will make teams pay for stacking the box to take away the running game, which could stifle the offense with Rosier. The slow-developing running plays seemed to be the ones that weren't hitting. Moving Donaldson inside makes sense. I wonder about putting Scaife at LT though, since he's one of the better OL at pass-protection.
 
On FSUs PR TD.....Matthews did a Michael Jackson 3 second jig, before even running.....only thing missing was a white glove and crotch grab..... .F-ing terrible STs play...
 
Last edited:
We currently do not have the athletes that fsu had during Richt’s fsu tenure to have a quick tempo offense. Richt plans his offense based upon the skill level of his players and their capabilities. Perhaps in the future with an elite offensive line we will be able to have a more dynamic offense.

Disagree, I think we do have the athletes at the skill positions Richt had at FSU with some of those teams. What we don't have is the OL that practically allowed Weinke to take a nap in the damned pocket, yawn, get up and deliver a ball.
 
Advertisement
Beating FSU any time is great, but the dramatics behind our last two victories have been nothing short of glorious and refreshing.

For years, we've had to suffer, being on the exact opposite side. Now? We get to have the last laugh, and trust me, I have 8 long years to catch up to my fill of laughter with the FSwho fans.

However, now that the storm has settled, we have some major clean up work, namely Play Calling, ST, and OL coaching.

Play Calling-

The Good:

Perry is a gamer.

The Bad:

Perry is still being handled with training wheels.

This game shouldn't have been this close, honestly. There were many exploitable alignments that FSU gave that we just didn't take advantage of. Posters on the "Game Day Discussion" thread were begging for us to get the ball the TE. Why? B/c FSU was selling out on the run, leaving one-on-one match ups with our TEs against their undersized LBs with the middle of the field more open than Superhead in the early 2000's!

As much as the defense willed us to victory, there were many head scratching offensive play calls that left us flabbergasted that could've easily snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. I think we've learned that it's time for Richt to either switch from his Blockbuster Video approach to the new age of Netlfix (shout out to @k9cane for that analogy) or simply hire a real, innovative OC that will best utilize both Perry and J Will's strengths while covering their weaknesses.


As much as we love some Coach Hartley, and he deserves a pay raise for his recruiting ability and development of the TE's, he ought not to coach another ST possession!

ST-

The Good:

Feagles is one the bench

The Bad:

Nothing has changed

Our ST could easily be the reason why we are 4-1 instead of 5-0, and this is not a one year itch. Our ST cost us games toward the end the season last year, as well. Whether it was a shank'd punt from Mr. Feagles, the ever so inopportune missed kicked from the Jersey Shore cast-off Michael Badgley, or lanes not being opened for kick returns, our ST has been less than stellar (and that's being very diplomatic in calling this unit out).


Now I see why Searles has lasted no longer than 3 yrs at all the schools he's coached at.

OL-

The Good:

Finally moving Donaldson back at guard

The Bad:

Giving up 5 Sacks 14 TFLs and avg. 3 ypc (ouch)

Remember when J Harris became no good b/c he was always in fear of getting hit w/ that OL....yeah, we're that bad again. Perry has now been sacked, I believe, 10x now in 2 1/2 games. That's no good. The fact that our OL can't generate a decent and consistent run game, and now we have teams literally chomping at the bit to crowd the L.O.S b/c we can't make them pay for it. Can Richt help with this? Of course...throw more quick screens. Throw more running back screens. Run some motion, run a real RPO...but the fact is, our OL has not been good no matter who was at the helm, and that's an indictment on their position coach.


So what have we learned? We've learned that this team is on the precipice of being really special. Year's past, it was our offense that would hang 35 ppg on an opponent, just for the defense to give up 38. Defense wins championships, but so does a competent offense and special teams unit. Richt is starting to show he's willing to play the best players regardless of class. Perry was a beginning of him moving out of his comfort zone. Moving Donaldson back to guard is another start. I also think Hightower should be starting over Cager. No way nephew (shout out to @Brooklyndee) drops the first TD on 3rd & goal in the 3rd qtr or that gimme slant in the 4th that would've put us up 8.

All in all, I like this team. Yes, we need to finish strong, obviously; but if Richt can secure our remaining recruiting targets (which should now include a punter), renovate his playbook (maybe add, I dunno, motion from time to time or a real RPO system), and get someone else to run ST's, we have chance to be really special for years to come.

Just my .02
I like it all, but here are my debatable points.

Perry
I dont think it's training wheels at all. I just don't think he knows the playbook well enough yet, and CMR has seen what happens when improvising turns into something other than "tuck and run". If we're going to turn him loose again, this week would be the best week to do it, outside of Duke. Not to mention you've already covered the oline....which is a huge reason Rosier struggled so mightily (admit it or not but it's true) although, I'll certainly agree that Perry is the better QB, Rosier can win games just as well with a decent offensive line, I mean you don't make it to D1 football for sucking ***.

ST
No debate here, can't agree more with the points you made, and to add to the Bad, our KR and PR coverage is horrendous. We have far too many stellar athletes on the bench during returns to be this bad...make some damned changes!

OL
Once again agree, but the oline play is more inconsistent than just bad. It's like some series we're getting the push, holding the block, etc., and some series they left their jock on the bench. Those are some big dudes we have, and it's time a fire was lit under their asses. Either play for 4 quarters or we'll find someone who will
 
I like it all, but here are my debatable points.

Perry
I dont think it's training wheels at all. I just don't think he knows the playbook well enough yet, and CMR has seen what happens when improvising turns into something other than "tuck and run". If we're going to turn him loose again, this week would be the best week to do it, outside of Duke. Not to mention you've already covered the oline....which is a huge reason Rosier struggled so mightily (admit it or not but it's true) although, I'll certainly agree that Perry is the better QB, Rosier can win games just as well with a decent offensive line, I mean you don't make it to D1 football for sucking ***.

ST
No debate here, can't agree more with the points you made, and to add to the Bad, our KR and PR coverage is horrendous. We have far too many stellar athletes on the bench during returns to be this bad...make some damned changes!

OL
Once again agree, but the oline play is more inconsistent than just bad. It's like some series we're getting the push, holding the block, etc., and some series they left their jock on the bench. Those are some big dudes we have, and it's time a fire was lit under their asses. Either play for 4 quarters or we'll find someone who will
I personally believe that Richt did put on the training wheels on Perry especially for the FSU game until after the second half when he had nothing to lose. Once Richt realized that its now or never Perry loosened up and the offense started to flow more.
 
As a long time Rosier apologist (up until the LSU game) I will admit I sat there in the stands in the 3rd qtr thinking to myself, "WTF did he ever start Perry? Rosier could have ran this offense and had us down 27-7. What was the point of playing Perry if you don't unleash him?"....Then Perry must have heard me and I quickly realized why he was crowned the King because we would have lost that game 34-7 if Rosier was the QB.

Perry just has that "it" factor and he feeds off energy and adrenaline. You could tell once he saw the D getting amped up he was going into beast mode. Cant teach that.

This D can be really special. I haven't seen a D this year that when it gets a head of steam and starts getting the "juice"..they cant be stopped. Brock Huard said our D is his favorite out of any team in the nation.
 
I personally believe that Richt did put on the training wheels on Perry especially for the FSU game until after the second half when he had nothing to lose. Once Richt realized that its now or never Perry loosened up and the offense started to flow more.

Perry dropped back to pass more in the first half than he did in the second. The "training wheels" only appeared to come off because two drives began inside the 30 thanks to the defense in the 3rd and points were scored. I get being emotionally invested and not noticing things but the stats are out there. Perry dropped back to pass about 20 times in the first half. He was unleashed as much as you can expect in a half where you only score seven points. The way people are talking they wanted him to get in 45 attempts.
 
Perry dropped back to pass more in the first half than he did in the second. The "training wheels" only appeared to come off because two drives began inside the 30 thanks to the defense in the 3rd and points were scored. I get being emotionally invested and not noticing things but the stats are out there. Perry dropped back to pass about 20 times in the first half. He was unleashed as much as you can expect in a half where you only score seven points. The way people are talking they wanted him to get in 45 attempts.
wasn't talking about drop backs, I just felt that he matured and the ball came out with more accuracy and confidence in his decision. Not questioning stats.
 
We likely aren't doing anything like the back half of 2016 because the last two starting QBs aren't close to Kaaya when it comes to be being consistently accurate. We all know about Rosier. He could be wildly inaccurate on a play to play basis. The FSU game for Perry probably looked a lot like those closed scrimmages we would get numbers from. He was consistently under 50% in those things and the spring game was the same deal. People who were there at the spring game talked about his ability to throw the ball. Some of his throws would show his obvious talent. "Make throws that Rosier could never make" was written plenty. I think @Lance Roffers wrote it once in his writeup about the FSU game too. Then you look at his numbers from the spring game and he's 11-26 or something. We had about 40 drop backs and completed 13 passes against the Noles. Not exactly the numbers you want for an offense to start throwing it around.
I think this runs along the same lines of why our running game struggles as much as it does -- Richt making it harder than it needs to be. We have exactly zero bread and butter plays that can get our playmakers the ball quickly to pick up chunk yardage. You look around all of CFB and teams have so many easy plays for their QB and yet it seems as if we have none.
 
Exactly, why I say we're on the precipice of being a perennial contender for a playoff spot.

Honestly, I think Richt can help out the OL with his play calling. In 2016, we started to gain rhythm against WVU w/ the quick WR screen passes. It loosened up the defense. I feel we've regressed in that area.
Yeah. I don't remember any bubble screens or screens at all for that matter.
 
Advertisement
Oh boy, the mob is gonna come after you now!! Seek refuge and shelter!!!

(Great post, BTW)

As for the Oline, I read that we are going with Scaife at RT and kicking Donaldson inside(where he belongs). This is a good step, I still think we have too many JAGS on this unit and the underclassmen seem to have a much higher ceiling than the upperclassmen.

I'll say this again: outside of Clemson, who has more NFL material than UM in the ACC? This roster isn't perfect but it's also really good.

Agree with you here, we need to play Scaife and Donaldson on the right side, Boulware at RG and stop subbing so much. Let that group gel more and I feel like we may have something.
 
I agree with much of the critique of play calling in the first half of the game. Running up the middle against a stacked box makes zero sense. However, that's basic 101 stuff. Not necessary for an innovative OC to correct. I think the playcalling will improve as N'Kosi proves to Richt in games and practice an ability to thread the needle during mismatches in the secondary.

O line woes aren't just a technique issue. It's largely our depth. Having an O line filled with under classmen is not reccomended in any situation. Our O-line has been depleted by our schools reputation for being bowl win free for a decade, no IPF, Kehoe and also those scholarship reductions. I'm not making excuses for recruiting prowess, though. Searels is not an elite recruiter. He's just not. I would love to see an O Line coach that can pull the 4 and 5 stars from any corner of the country. Particularly our own corner of the state.
 
Last edited:
I like it all, but here are my debatable points.

Perry
I dont think it's training wheels at all. I just don't think he knows the playbook well enough yet, and CMR has seen what happens when improvising turns into something other than "tuck and run". If we're going to turn him loose again, this week would be the best week to do it, outside of Duke. Not to mention you've already covered the oline....which is a huge reason Rosier struggled so mightily (admit it or not but it's true) although, I'll certainly agree that Perry is the better QB, Rosier can win games just as well with a decent offensive line, I mean you don't make it to D1 football for sucking ***.

ST
No debate here, can't agree more with the points you made, and to add to the Bad, our KR and PR coverage is horrendous. We have far too many stellar athletes on the bench during returns to be this bad...make some damned changes!

OL
Once again agree, but the oline play is more inconsistent than just bad. It's like some series we're getting the push, holding the block, etc., and some series they left their jock on the bench. Those are some big dudes we have, and it's time a fire was lit under their asses. Either play for 4 quarters or we'll find someone who will

I agree w u bro; here’s why I said Richt holds Perry back; when Perry is hot, the tempo is slowed, and inexcusably we start running the ball unsuccessfully 3x in a row.

Our OL is inconsistent, but it’s more bad than good. We even struggled against SSt to open up running lanes. I see poor engage techniques, and whether they are big or not, getting pushed back in to the back field shows a lack of explosive strength which is mostly generated from the legs.

All in all, this team feels better than last years team, but to take it to the next level, our OL and ST gotta be fixed ASAP. I think less predictable play calling can help w that. Any time the announcers are calling goal line plays, that’s a problem. Lol
 
wasn't talking about drop backs, I just felt that he matured and the ball came out with more accuracy and confidence in his decision. Not questioning stats.

Don't bother with Fin, dude loves Rosier and will take any shot he can at Perry.

It's creepy to be honest
 
Back
Top