4th and goal

[Consigliere]

Wow you really are a tremendous ****. Is that really a response?

Keep supporting Golden and enjoy eating Mark's ****!

You gotta stop watching *** ****, Nancy. First you want to kick field goals from the two, now you're talking about eating a man's ****. But we're not judging you.

Read comprehension ****? You should grab a breath mint, mark's **** smells like your mothers tampon on the 15th of the month.

 

[RohanMotor]

That would have been a perfect time for the play action

I actually thought it was going to be and hit the Warlord in the end zone.

 

[AntwanJ306]

Dude thought there was a chance that VfreakingT had a chance to score three TDs and three 2pt conversions. SMDH.

Zero points for attempting to refute anything I said. Good work. Our D has been insanely good over the last 3+ years. Good point!

Side note: VfreakingT. Can I use that?

You've never acknowledged a point against you in your life, so I don't take that as criticism.

Only an angry banner-didn't-fly imbecile would use "last 3+ years defense" as a reason to make that call. Our defense has been very good against the bad teams, and VT was clearly one of the worst teams we played.

So, Nancy, keep kicking those field goals from the two. Love the aggressiveness.

Its not "kicking field goals from the two" that is the problem. Its Goldens total lack of situational awareness and simple mathematics.

Also, our D is historically bad vs bad teams. Virginia Tech went nuts on us last year and they sucked. Cincinatti went for 500. Arkansas st 330. ****, even Danny O'Brien looked like Joe Montana against us before getting benched two games later. Its not unreasonable to think VT couldve flipped it on at anytime during that game based on how bad our defense was and is.

That's the thing, you're hung up on "math" when the whole world knew the game had been over since halftime.

As for the defense against bad teams, last year means absolutely nothing. And Cincinnati didn't go for 500. They went for 422 while chasing our 55 points. Same with Arkansas St. Good offense that was chasing us the whole time. VT was awful, and everyone knew it. But you guys saw them turning into Baylor and lighting up the scoreboard after three quarters. Makes sense.

 

[AntwanJ306]

Read comprehension ****? You should grab a breath mint, mark's **** smells like your mothers tampon on the 15th of the month.

Is that really intended to offend someone or make someone mad? Corny *** insults from a guy who's ****ed off that Miami dominated. The world is laughing at you.

 

[Consigliere]

-Up 24-0

-Offense has been money all night(at that point in the game)

-On their 2-yard line

-Their offense is terrible

*Goes for FG

Actual the offense at that point of the game was not money.

The two prior drives (in the 3rd quarter) were 3 and out.

We also know our defense has been pretty bad before.

Like I said, I'm going for a FG after the turnover. Taking the points. Increasing the lead to 27.

 

[Soul Cane]

I didn't have a prob with the call to go for it. I just wasn't a big fan of the bunched-up formation.

 

[Consigliere]

Read comprehension ****? You should grab a breath mint, mark's **** smells like your mothers tampon on the 15th of the month.

Is that really intended to offend someone or make someone mad? Corny *** insults from a guy who's ****ed off that Miami dominated. The world is laughing at you.

Calling someone Nancy, how clever!

Keep supporting Al, keep fighting the good fight.

 

[OrangetieFatface]

Dude thought there was a chance that VfreakingT had a chance to score three TDs and three 2pt conversions. SMDH.

Zero points for attempting to refute anything I said. Good work. Our D has been insanely good over the last 3+ years. Good point!

Side note: VfreakingT. Can I use that?

You've never acknowledged a point against you in your life, so I don't take that as criticism.

Only an angry banner-didn't-fly imbecile would use "last 3+ years defense" as a reason to make that call. Our defense has been very good against the bad teams, and VT was clearly one of the worst teams we played.

So, Nancy, keep kicking those field goals from the two. Love the aggressiveness.

Its not "kicking field goals from the two" that is the problem. Its Goldens total lack of situational awareness and simple mathematics.

Also, our D is historically bad vs bad teams. Virginia Tech went nuts on us last year and they sucked. Cincinatti went for 500. Arkansas st 330. ****, even Danny O'Brien looked like Joe Montana against us before getting benched two games later. Its not unreasonable to think VT couldve flipped it on at anytime during that game based on how bad our defense was and is.

That's the thing, you're hung up on "math" when the whole world knew the game had been over since halftime.

As for the defense against bad teams, last year means absolutely nothing. And Cincinnati didn't go for 500. They went for 422 while chasing our 55 points. Same with Arkansas St. Good offense that was chasing us the whole time. VT was awful, and everyone knew it. But you guys saw them turning into Baylor and lighting up the scoreboard after three quarters. Makes sense.

Game wasnt over until 30-0. Even your hero Golden thought so. Duke played until the 5 minute mark in the 4th. 2 big plays makes it 24-16 instead of 27-16. Im just being reasonable and not going with the "yeah but we pretty much assumed that sometime in the third quarter it was over regardless of mathematics, so **** it, call whatever play you want" excuse.

 

[Consigliere]

Dude thought there was a chance that VfreakingT had a chance to score three TDs and three 2pt conversions. SMDH.

Zero points for attempting to refute anything I said. Good work. Our D has been insanely good over the last 3+ years. Good point!

Side note: VfreakingT. Can I use that?

You've never acknowledged a point against you in your life, so I don't take that as criticism.

Only an angry banner-didn't-fly imbecile would use "last 3+ years defense" as a reason to make that call. Our defense has been very good against the bad teams, and VT was clearly one of the worst teams we played.

So, Nancy, keep kicking those field goals from the two. Love the aggressiveness.

Its not "kicking field goals from the two" that is the problem. Its Goldens total lack of situational awareness and simple mathematics.

Also, our D is historically bad vs bad teams. Virginia Tech went nuts on us last year and they sucked. Cincinatti went for 500. Arkansas st 330. ****, even Danny O'Brien looked like Joe Montana against us before getting benched two games later. Its not unreasonable to think VT couldve flipped it on at anytime during that game based on how bad our defense was and is.

That's the thing, you're hung up on "math" when the whole world knew the game had been over since halftime.

As for the defense against bad teams, last year means absolutely nothing. And Cincinnati didn't go for 500. They went for 422 while chasing our 55 points. Same with Arkansas St. Good offense that was chasing us the whole time. VT was awful, and everyone knew it. But you guys saw them turning into Baylor and lighting up the scoreboard after three quarters. Makes sense.

If last year means nothing, how about 2012? Does that mean nothing?

Keep supporting Al and Mark, tin foil fan club unite!!!!

 

[AntwanJ306]

Read comprehension ****? You should grab a breath mint, mark's **** smells like your mothers tampon on the 15th of the month.

Is that really intended to offend someone or make someone mad? Corny *** insults from a guy who's ****ed off that Miami dominated. The world is laughing at you.

Calling someone Nancy, how clever!

Keep supporting Al, keep fighting the good fight.

Sure, and I'll keep watching you get ****ed off and frustrated while cracking tampon insults. Uh oh, things aren't going the way you expected. Better hope UNC and Virginia can do your dirty work. LMAO.

 

[Angry Ibis]

Glad we went for it. I go for the aggressive move there up 24. There is always second guessing when you don't get the TD.

Many of us said so at the time. Before the play was called. Not second guessing at that point.

Some people liked it. Some didn't. Doesn't change that there is always going to be second guessing by at least some people when you don't score on a play like that.

 

[Southtampacane]

Even if they made it, the decision was atrocious. A FG makes it a 4 score game. I know people like to go for it all the time now, but sometimes you just have to be smart and take the points.

 

[AntwanJ306]

Zero points for attempting to refute anything I said. Good work. Our D has been insanely good over the last 3+ years. Good point!

Side note: VfreakingT. Can I use that?

You've never acknowledged a point against you in your life, so I don't take that as criticism.

Only an angry banner-didn't-fly imbecile would use "last 3+ years defense" as a reason to make that call. Our defense has been very good against the bad teams, and VT was clearly one of the worst teams we played.

So, Nancy, keep kicking those field goals from the two. Love the aggressiveness.

Its not "kicking field goals from the two" that is the problem. Its Goldens total lack of situational awareness and simple mathematics.

Also, our D is historically bad vs bad teams. Virginia Tech went nuts on us last year and they sucked. Cincinatti went for 500. Arkansas st 330. ****, even Danny O'Brien looked like Joe Montana against us before getting benched two games later. Its not unreasonable to think VT couldve flipped it on at anytime during that game based on how bad our defense was and is.

That's the thing, you're hung up on "math" when the whole world knew the game had been over since halftime.

As for the defense against bad teams, last year means absolutely nothing. And Cincinnati didn't go for 500. They went for 422 while chasing our 55 points. Same with Arkansas St. Good offense that was chasing us the whole time. VT was awful, and everyone knew it. But you guys saw them turning into Baylor and lighting up the scoreboard after three quarters. Makes sense.

If last year means nothing, how about 2012? Does that mean nothing?

Keep supporting Al and Mark, tin foil fan club unite!!!!

Uh, 2012 means nothing.

You're desperate and grasping. Maybe UNC can save your season.

 

[Angry Ibis]

It all fits in Foldens M.O. of actively trying to lose. Why take an easy 3 to ice the game when you can run a short yardage play to Gus that you've run in every game this season for short yardage, and hasnt worked yet?

He probably fancies himself a "players coach". In reality hes just a bafoon absorbing a monster paycheck.

Weak. Try better in the future.

Gus ran 20 for 115 and 2 TDs, including one from 3 yards out through the line.

Gus had a good game.

3rd or 4th and short to Gus off tackle hardly ever works. Same play, same result.

Lets not start acting like we havent been bottom 10 in 3rd down efficiency all year before this game

"Gotta convert those money downs"

Great distraction bull**** at the end. I am not talking about all season or the last 3 seasons or ******* Al Golden at Temple. This thread is about last night. Going into that play we were running and blocking well. Including Gus who had already put one in from short yardage.

The play was not successful. I still would have gone for the TD.

 

[Ukcanes1]

No problem with them going for it. VT wasn't getting 3 TDs and 3 two-point conversions unless the wheels fell off & we turned the ball over multiple times. The play call left me scratching my head but I'm good either stepping on VTs throat or making them drive 98 yards if we don't get in.

 

[Consigliere]

You've never acknowledged a point against you in your life, so I don't take that as criticism.

Only an angry banner-didn't-fly imbecile would use "last 3+ years defense" as a reason to make that call. Our defense has been very good against the bad teams, and VT was clearly one of the worst teams we played.

So, Nancy, keep kicking those field goals from the two. Love the aggressiveness.

Its not "kicking field goals from the two" that is the problem. Its Goldens total lack of situational awareness and simple mathematics.

Also, our D is historically bad vs bad teams. Virginia Tech went nuts on us last year and they sucked. Cincinatti went for 500. Arkansas st 330. ****, even Danny O'Brien looked like Joe Montana against us before getting benched two games later. Its not unreasonable to think VT couldve flipped it on at anytime during that game based on how bad our defense was and is.

That's the thing, you're hung up on "math" when the whole world knew the game had been over since halftime.

As for the defense against bad teams, last year means absolutely nothing. And Cincinnati didn't go for 500. They went for 422 while chasing our 55 points. Same with Arkansas St. Good offense that was chasing us the whole time. VT was awful, and everyone knew it. But you guys saw them turning into Baylor and lighting up the scoreboard after three quarters. Makes sense.

If last year means nothing, how about 2012? Does that mean nothing?

Keep supporting Al and Mark, tin foil fan club unite!!!!

Uh, 2012 means nothing.

You're desperate and grasping. Maybe UNC can save your season.

Keep supporting Al and Mark, everything is falling into place.

 

[Consigliere]

Glad we went for it. I go for the aggressive move there up 24. There is always second guessing when you don't get the TD.

Many of us said so at the time. Before the play was called. Not second guessing at that point.

Some people liked it. Some didn't. Doesn't change that there is always going to be second guessing by at least some people when you don't score on a play like that.

That is fine but it isn't a second guess if at the time we said kick the FG.

 

[AntwanJ306]

Keep supporting Al and Mark, everything is falling into place.

Keep paying for banners that don't fly while we're winning and playing well. Something will change for you soon, I'm sure.

 

[AntwanJ306]

That is fine but it isn't a second guess if at the time we said kick the FG.

So you were wrong before AND after.

 

[OrangetieFatface]

It all fits in Foldens M.O. of actively trying to lose. Why take an easy 3 to ice the game when you can run a short yardage play to Gus that you've run in every game this season for short yardage, and hasnt worked yet?

He probably fancies himself a "players coach". In reality hes just a bafoon absorbing a monster paycheck.

Weak. Try better in the future.

Gus ran 20 for 115 and 2 TDs, including one from 3 yards out through the line.

Gus had a good game.

3rd or 4th and short to Gus off tackle hardly ever works. Same play, same result.

Lets not start acting like we havent been bottom 10 in 3rd down efficiency all year before this game

"Gotta convert those money downs"

Great distraction bull**** at the end. I am not talking about all season or the last 3 seasons or ****ing Al Golden at Temple. This thread is about last night. Going into that play we were running and blocking well. Including Gus who had already put one in from short yardage.

The play was not successful. I still would have gone for the TD.

I guess. Why deliver the death blow when we can try something that hasnt worked all year backed by statistics(that are considered distractors for some reason)? Even if we score a TD i still say wrong call. I guess i just disagree with the idea of not putting the game to bed when we had the chance to.