just ask bama if stars matter
just ask bama if stars matter
Pretty much where I would expect 3 stars to be. Some decent role players, a few breakouts who were underrated, and some guys I have never heard of. Staff evaluation always wins out, but recruiting sites do a decent job of projecting how 17 year olds will turn out. There will always be some variability because information is incomplete at that age. Knowing nothing else I always take a 5* over a 4* and a 4* over a 3*.
Not sure I buy that SFla 3*s are better than other recruiting hotbeds like Louisiana, Ohio, California, Georgia, Alabama, etc...
He was a 4 star on ESPN before he committee and got moved to a 4 star on 247 after he committedStars do matter no matter anyone says. The kids who have produced the most & shown the most potential are rated the highest. That doesn't mean stars are definitive of talent. Too many kids are late bloomers or never get the right exposure. You can't fix the system so that's why you can't evaluate off of stars or you're doomed to fail. Stars don't account for work ethic, character, & many other factors either.
There is a big problem with your statement. Ofcourse the star system works... It's because the services attach value to the schools that sign players... Case in point, last week we had 2 kids commit that were not rated at all... and suddenly they get 3 stars attached to their name ONLY BECAUSE MIAMI OFFERED. The system is backward. Value is pegged to the Universities, which is pegged to Subscriber base + winning tradition. So a school like USC or Texas, consistently will ALWAYS have 4 and 5 star players because the services figure if Texas or USC likes them, they are a sure thing.
Miami on the other hand, has a small subscriber base and has been in the dumbs lately, so our commits don't get bumped up as much.
You are fooling yourself if you think most of the kids they evaluate they see first hand. They don't... They don't have the manpower to do it.
Better to stick with local recruiting guys like Blustein and Fisch who see these kids day in and day out and know what they are talking about.
The best example of the Star System being a complete crock of **** is Darrell Langham... Probably top 3 WR in the State and they have him as a 2 star... What a joke.
Marc Guillon 4*
Akieem Jolla 4*
Curtis Justus 4*
JR Mounts 4*
Alex Pou 4*
Terrell Walden 4*
John Wood 4*
Andrew Bain 4*
Willie Cooper 4*
Tyrone Moss 4*
Rhyan Anderson 4*
James Bryant 4*
Kirby Freeman 4*
Dwayne Hendricks 4*
Andrew Johnson 4*
Charlie Jones 4*
Lovon Ponder 4*
Bobby Washington 4*
Luqman Abdullah 4*
Chris Barney 4*
Dajleon Farr 4*
Richard Gordon 4*
Courtney Harris 4*
Demetri Stewart 4*
Dedrick Epps 4*
Ryan Hill 4*
Josh Holmes 4*
Javarris James 4*
Tervaris Johnson 4*
Kylan Robinson 4*
Bobby Drama 4*
Jermaine McKenzie 4*
Demarcus Van Dyke 4*
Doug Wiggins 4*
Ramon Buchanan 4*
Jordan Futch 4*
CJ Holton 4*
Aldarious Johnson 4*
Davon Johnson 4*
Ben Jones 4*
Jeremy Lewis 4*
Vaughn Telemaque 4*
Dyron Dye 4*
Jermaine Johnson 4*
Jamal Reid 4*
Tavadis Glenn 4*
Storm Johnson 4*
Travis Williams 4*
I quit reading at Glen Cook.
just ask bama if stars matter
You can also ask Texas and USC about the importance of stars. **** stars eveyone likes 5 stars but I put more emphasis on coaches talent evaluation skill and development as well which Golden clearly has.