2027 Race to 300

Canes have 5 of the top 20 with 247 player rankings in 2027 class with a chance to get to 7. Remarkable. I don’t think Saban or Smart have ever done that
Just checked, Taint had 5 in the top 20 and 6 in the top 23 in 2021. 8-4 had 7 of the top 25 in 2022. UGA had 5 of the top 20 and 7 of the top 23 in 2018. It seemed like Bama had 3-4 of the top 20 every single year. Still, it shows we have a true elite haul this year.
 
Just checked, Taint had 5 in the top 20 and 6 in the top 23 in 2021. 8-4 had 7 of the top 25 in 2022. UGA had 5 of the top 20 and 7 of the top 23 in 2018. It seemed like Bama had 3-4 of the top 20 every single year. Still, it shows we have a true elite haul this year.
Thanks for the research. So 7 in the top 20 would be unprecedented. That would require Matthews and Jacobs to flip. Tall order
 
Pretty interesting and surprising tidbit from Ross Dellenger, the reporter who recently interviewed prez Joe; paraphrasing

He said we are actively using the B1G’s self-imposed salary cap in negative recruiting terms; and both us (+ 3 other ACC schools) and Texas Tech are cause to believe that the ACC and XII might not impose a similar salary cap conference wide. Ross and Andy Staples felt pretty confident that the SEC was going to do something similar as the B1G.

They released their podcast (College Football Enquirer via Yahoo Sports) before this news of Brett Yormark stepping down in January, which I’m assuming could reorder the big 12 conference’s priorities away from this compensation ceiling. I think the big XII is more likely than the ACC to impose the cap because:

1. Cody Campbell has spent tens of millions on getting the PCSA passed

2. The Big XII doesn’t have a major spender outside TT. Maybe BYU and Arizona, but it’s doubtful that their totals exceed 50 Million


Speaking for the ACC and its legislative process; Not sure if 4 schools, or even one, are/is enough to limit a self-imposed cap from being enacted.

I’m of the belief that these conference wide measures mean absolutely nothing considering the B1G said it was effectively immediately yet 5-6 B1G schools are immediately in violation of the cap; yet voted with the rest of their conference members to approve of the cap. But if we can benefit from a toothless PR stunt/confidence game, that’d be great.

We saw how quickly the SEC walked back their own confidence game/stunt when it was reported they were going to enact a must-sit-for-one-year mandate for any player’s second transfer, and a ban on any transferring in-between SEC clubs. So we’ll see what transpires in these upcoming weeks.
 
Last edited:
Podcast is 3 SEC grads who admit their bias. Ofc they are still behind the times a bit in believing john Ruiz is Cody Campbell for us
IMG_2488.jpeg
 
How's this getting us to 300 @cookies :LOL:
Sow seeds of doubt into committed B1G recruits’ families’ minds that their payments will decrease after arriving on campus as the conference seeks to implement these reforms; and their compensation won’t be competing for dollars w/ women’s volleyball and soccer and men’s basketball and baseball at Miami like they would at B1G schools (and likely, eventually, SEC schools too if they impose this fugazi salary cap)

It’s just an extra weapon to use tbh. Kids rarely flip for just one reason alone.
 
Pretty interesting and surprising tidbit from Ross Dellenger, the reporter who recently interviewed prez Joe; paraphrasing

He said we are actively using the B1G’s self-imposed salary cap in negative recruiting terms; and both us (+ 3 other ACC schools) and Texas Tech are cause to believe that the ACC and XII might not impose a similar salary cap conference wide. Ross and Andy Staples felt pretty confident that the SEC was going to do something similar as the B1G.

They released their podcast (College Football Enquirer via Yahoo Sports) before this news of Brett Yormark stepping down in January, which I’m assuming could reorder the big 12 conference’s priorities away from this compensation ceiling. I think the big XII is more likely than the ACC to impose the cap because:

1. Cody Campbell has spent tens of millions on getting the PCSA passed

2. The Big XII doesn’t have a major spender outside TT. Maybe BYU and Arizona, but it’s doubtful that their totals exceed 50 Million


Speaking for the ACC and its legislative process; Not sure if 4 schools, or even one, are/is enough to limit a self-imposed cap from being enacted.

I’m of the belief that these conference wide measures mean absolutely nothing considering the B1G said it was effectively immediately yet 5-6 B1G schools are immediately in violation of the cap; yet voted with the rest of their conference members to approve of the cap. But if we can benefit from a toothless PR stunt/confidence game, that’d be great.

We saw how quickly the SEC walked back their own confidence game/stunt when it was reported they were going to enact a must-sit-for-one-year mandate for any player’s second transfer, and a ban on any transferring in-between SEC clubs. So we’ll see what transpires in these upcoming weeks.
BYU could take a dump on Cody and TTech if its alums decided to open up the vault — because, well, it’s a very big and full vault
 
BYU could take a dump on Cody and TTech if its alums decided to open up the vault — because, well, it’s a very big and full vault
They’re about to land their fourth straight one and done five-star wing on the basketball side, and that’s not cheap. Mark Pope has to be a generationally awful recruiter for BYU to level up and Kentucky to level down as soon as he changed jobs. Dude can’t land his former teammates’ sons
 
They’re about to land their fourth straight one and done five-star wing on the basketball side, and that’s not cheap. Mark Pope has to be a generationally awful recruiter for BYU to level up and Kentucky to level down as soon as he changed jobs. Dude can’t land his former teammates’ sons
I don’t think regular folk understand LDS money.
 
Back
Top