And the ****head **** on everything “mopes” who rip a class with two of those DT targets landed because of Russell and similar, ****ing on the accomplishments, can go to purgatory as well and fight their slurper counterparts.
You're on a ******* tear lately
It's excellent. We've had our small disagreements in the past but I feel like this one here is pretty simple. We get our guys we succeeded. We don't we failed. Idk whats so hard about it lol
What you’re witnessing is someone with a biased agenda and zero objectivity relentlessly arguing that there’s no real standard to consider successful performance during this period except whatever the performance is.You're on a ******* tear lately
No argument out of me with that. My issue isn't with your point at all. My issue was people making blind assumptions that we should land this particular kid or that one without knowing what's involved(from the kids side) if the point is simply group A is commonly known as more talented than this group B and we need an infusion of some talent from group A. Than I agree completely. But our own evaluations determine who group A is. Not web sites random dudes work for who are more often than not paid well for their opinions. At this point the staff has shown for the most part who group A is. So that's that. Also maybe I haven't been clear enough throughout the years. Beyond the university in itself I don't care about my ties to such and such. When there's something to be critical about I'm one of the most critical you can come across as I think you already know hermano. I'm also one who will put the blame squarely on all of the shoulders it belongs. Not blindly throwing shade just for the **** of it. You're aware of my ties to Mario and I still say here and to him anything I would have an issue with. That's just me. No filters. Or atleast not many. Lol. Have a great day brother. Hope our mutual tie (urs far more than mine)is doing great. I haven't seen him all off season. Hopefully he's getting some relaxation in. Knowing him,highly unlikely.
Is that what you're saying you think I was doing? Lmao. Jesus Christ. I wasn't arguing **** for one. I was simply trying to get a simple straight forward answer of what dictates a whiff. Simple. Is it a player in particular you miss on or is it a position group with a standard YOU already answered & u weren't the only person I responded towards. There's my bias. I'm not stupid enough to think the only kids worth our time are the ones these jackasses who follow recruiting websites and people like ivins and Gaby two people who've never played a single down of football at most likely any level let alone a high one should tell us who's better than who. I'll stick with coach evals for that. If that's a bias well than **** it all I'm biased. Yo for real this ***** wild. You win. I thought we were better than that. Always good to know where people really stand. All the same out of respect for our mutual acquaintance I'll still say have a great day. Thanks for your response. If that wasn't in response to me and others are being more vehement than I on this then I'll shut up and apologize as I'd hope I'm simply being defensive. Cause you're one of the few dudes I wouldn't anticipate this out of.
Well with the narrative being painted Michigan and the Patriots simply wasted time on Tom Brady as he was clearly a whiff.
Yes, all of this including the staff showing who Group A is. I’ve accepted Group A being the guys on the OV’s in June, most of whom have the rankings anyhow. I think we get 2-3 of them because Mario’s a great recruiter. My issue is on the hypothetical situation that we landed none of them, we should be honest about the misses.
The recruits will all ultimately be judged at the end of their ply here. It’s possible that the gems become 1st round picks and the 5 stars fail.
Not you, the other guy.
My bad. I get defensive sometimes and just jump. U know I don't really read most of the threads. I just scan and I know today I been going in on this one. So I assumed it was me y'all were talking about. My fault entirely.
I understand, believe me. Lol
Yes and no. Same argument can be made that statistically speaking a good percentage of dudes who eventually become those early round picks weren't highly ranked coming out of high school. It's actually a pretty high percentage all things considered. But we certainly need an infusion of talent at the position and we'll be getting it. I'm CONFIDENT y'all will be plenty happy with our dt recruiting this year. The bar can't be what a & m did a few years ago as that was insane and you see not practical either since several already moved on. But we're gonna be good at dt. You'll all know when you're supposed to.
