forums

2022 Athletic Revenue $$$

Torch_Da1

Torch_Da1

Freshman
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
147
This is crazy looking at some of the schools on
here that we didn't make the top 50!
FB_IMG_1687311425483.jpg
 
Advertisement
2022 Data according to EADA.
1687316613609.png


... We always match our Revenue/Expense for anyone questioning why we had no profit. And if you actually look, a lot of schools do this - including pretty much every private school.

Also this was reporting data from 2021-2022 year. So the actual numbers could be different depending than the image and still be correct. Depends when they got that data for the public schools - could be slightly newer. It is self-reported data by the schools to meet Title IV requirements. So this is as/more trustworthy than likely any number you'll find regarding Miamis Athletic financials.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
OK, class, what lesson have we learned today?

DON'T TRUST THOSE TWEET-READY AND OH-SO-COLORFUL GRAPHIC CHARTS THAT PURPORT TO SAY SOMETHING IMPORTANT WHILE PROVIDING ZERO CONTEXT.

Here are some thoughts...

1. If you don't see Notre Dame, the list is suspect. Not because Notre Dame is so great, but because it is a private school that probably pulls in the biggest revenue of all the private schools.

2. If you see schools you don't recognize (BINGHAMTON?), then you know something sketchy is happening.

3. Regardless of whether Miami's enrollment is 12,000 or 15,000 or 17,000, there's simply no substitute for having an enrollment of 60,000 to 70,000 (I'm looking at both Ohio Taint and UCF here). Conference profit-sharing is one thing. Apparel contracts are another thing. But there's no way we will ever be able to hit the OVERALL additional revenue that comes from having a massive enrollment and massive alumni base.
 
Torch_Da1 said:
This is crazy looking at some of the schools on
here that we didn't make the top 50!
View attachment 243225
Click to expand...

@TheOriginalCane

U see UCLA on there? What did I tell this board about their merch & incentive clause when they signed w/ JB/Nike, my guy? UCLA’s AD is still in the red from the UA fiasco + Covid, but their AD has made a chit ton of back end $$ which has closed that enormous gap that they faced.

Also, private schools don’t have to disclose such revenue earnings, but I do know Baylor, ND & SC r some of the highest
 
Rellyrell said:
@TheOriginalCane

U see UCLA on there? What did I tell this board about their merch & incentive clause when they signed w/ JB/Nike, my guy? UCLA’s AD is still in the red from the UA fiasco + Covid, but their AD has made a chit ton of back end $$ which has closed that enormous gap that they faced.

Also, private schools don’t have to disclose such revenue earnings, but I do know Baylor, ND & SC r some of the highest
Click to expand...
Southern California is also not on the initial list. They are sometimes perceived like Miami by the uniformed. "With a name like Southern California they must be a public institution."
 
Rellyrell said:
@TheOriginalCane

U see UCLA on there? What did I tell this board about their merch & incentive clause when they signed w/ JB/Nike, my guy? UCLA’s AD is still in the red from the UA fiasco + Covid, but their AD has made a chit ton of back end $$ which has closed that enormous gap that they faced.

Also, private schools don’t have to disclose such revenue earnings, but I do know Baylor, ND & SC r some of the highest
Click to expand...


UCLA is down at 47th and Cal is at 34th. Which seems crazy for the "sports flagship" state schools of California, though they both split their markets with major private schools (USC and Stanford).

****, the Pac 12 don't pay well...
 
Advertisement
TheOriginalCane said:
UCLA is down at 47th and Cal is at 34th. Which seems crazy for the "sports flagship" state schools of California, though they both split their markets with major private schools (USC and Stanford).

****, the Pac 12 don't pay well...
Click to expand...

Which is y those apparel deals were so necessary. The PAC-12 hasn’t had representation in the CFP so extra bonus revenue has never kicked in. But trust, this a major improvement. For 2019-20 Fiscal year, Cal was 57th & UCLA 56th among P5 programs.
 
calinative umstudent said:
2022 Data according to EADA.
View attachment 243239

... We always match our Revenue/Expense for anyone questioning why we had no profit. And if you actually look, a lot of schools do this - including pretty much every private school.

Also this was reporting data from 2021-2022 year. So the actual numbers could be different depending than the image and still be correct. Depends when they got that data for the public schools - could be slightly newer. It is self-reported data by the schools to meet Title IV requirements. So this is as/more trustworthy than likely any number you'll find regarding Miamis Athletic financials.
Click to expand...
Debit to Restricted Reserve on the expense side.
 
Back
Top