Search results

A little from column A, A little from column B.

He had a bad game against UNC like all the other LB's, but he's shown enough to give me some hope. Very heady player. He should start at Mike this year, but I guess Jennings is coming back and they'll probably go with an undeserving senior, because we never see that around here. Anyway, I'm...

Could I interest you in 2 at least? One to start and one for depth? :)

I'm not worried about CB or OL this year. But, LB? We have a serious problem at that spot and we need a bridge to get us by until Manny or his successor, brings in someone to train those guys.

This last phrase in bold. is kind of my whole point. Yes, we have young talent, but we don't have anyone who knows anything to train them. That's why we need to bring LB's that can start for us and even give us depth. Manny's guy has left us with a gaping maw in the center of our D. Since Manny...

Yep. LB play has hurt us as much as anything under Baker. For instance, if Shaq/Pink were starting for us against UNC this year, not only do they not gash us for historic numbers, we're actually in the game. Regardless of the number, we don't have any reliable LB's (outside of Flagg) that I...

I think this could be muted partially by not only better training via Simpson, but also the way he has his DL play. In other words, his guys weren't just interested in TFL's and sacks, but also in stopping the run and containing the QB from taking off. Because of this, I don't know that we'll...

...we need to bring in 3 LB's who will become our starters. If we keep the Striker position, then we're already set there, but we still need 3 for depth. We have experience at CB and it looks like we'll get the former #3 CB in the country to take one of our spots. Also, T-Rob will be training...