Search results

It didn’t help. If the RB doesn’t get hurt none of this is even an issue. That’s only negative to running on third, in my opinion. I do understand why some one would choose to knee there. I personally wouldn’t have.

I’m on board with Mario personally, I just don’t fully get how the decisions are in the same ballpark at all.

I don’t hate the thought behind trying to gain yards in that particular situation. A first down ends the game no questions asked. What if Texas grabs his facemask? The only reason any of this is a question is because of the RB getting hurt. We don’t know for sure that Texas doesn’t do something...

None of this started about Mario. I wouldn’t have held it against Mario if he did the exact same thing as Washington yesterday in that situation. They are one first down away from icing the game. This playcalling isn’t overaggressive for no reason like the GT game.

Cause running with 30 seconds and the opposing team having no timeouts is not the same scenario. Texas misses a tackle or has a penalty the game is over. Mario was running for no reason. The game was over if he kneels. Washington kneels three times and the punt could be blocked or returned for a...

They ran it on third down. The only difference is the injury. This isn’t running when it’s clear that the game is over with kneel downs.

Them not kneeling didn’t impact the outcome at all. An injury, and two penalties gave Texas second life.