Search results

Voters would have gone with Morgan. He was squeaky clean, and a tackling machine. Webster had off field troubles that most award voters don't like. I'm not saying who was better, just that Morgan won EVERY award in 2000, and Webster coming back wouldn't have meant Webster wins those awards...

Morgan would have won the awards still. Not saying Webster wouldn't have deserved the attention, but Morgan was more popular among voting types.

That's what you think. They'd put all kinds of trash ahead of him. Even the All ACC teams are biased against us. Oh he'd be deserving, but you know how they treat our players on those lists.