Search results

It's all good. Things can remain respectful. But when you tell me I don't know what I'm talking about when I aced my First Amendment class in law school, well, yeah, then I'm going to tell you otherwise. Now let's beat Appalachian State.

Nor am I. There's a difference between politics and civics. There's nothing wrong with acquiring accurate knowledge about how our government actually works. Nothing more to discuss on this tangent.

I'll make this simple, there has been an over-focus on point spread. I don't care about that. We need for our offense to run (and execute) all of the plays in our playbook in a way that gives everyone familiarity and confidence. And we need our defense to rediscover the ability to tackle...

Again, you misread what I wrote, and you continue to misstate me. I never said that that anything he wrote was a violation of the First Amendment. This is why I laughed at your ignorance. When HE cited the First Amendment as HIS protection for his misguided notion that he could say anything...

Oh lord, now you're getting your daddy to fight your fights. I don't give a **** about your silly nonsense. The Founding Fathers are long dead, but they understood that there are exceptions to every rule. And Congress and the Supreme Court have recognized that for centuries. Never, not once...

Post #42. Read it sometime.

You're so right. I learned nothing about the First Amendment in law school. Plenty of governmental restrictions on all of the rights in the First Amendment. Look it up sometime. As just one example, the "anti-riot" law just passed in Florida is a governmental limit on the Freedom of...

This is friggin' hilarious. Where do you come up with these nutty gems? I never said any such thing, but I'm still laughing about the fact that you actually typed out that sentence.

Ah, yes, the transitive property of college football. Team A beat Team B who beat Team C. Always fun to deal with that logic. And computer models rule and UCF won a National Championship. On and on it goes. I don't think many people are saying it will be "easy". Instead, we have been...

That CONGRESS shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech. The First Amendment applies to the government, not to individuals or corporations or employers. Not to mention that every clause of the First Amendment has well-known exceptions where Congress (and/or the government) actually CAN...

It's not a "political discussion" to point out that you don't know the text or the meaning of the First Amendment freedom of speech. Here's a hint, it has nothing to do with whether you are "endangering anyone".

No you can't. Clearly you don't know what you are talking about.

You should read it sometime. It doesn't say what you think it says.

He doesn't. He also doesn't have to dump his poison-laced ****e on all of us in every single post.

I don't care if you've been married for 30 years, if you start beating your wife, it's time to get a divorce. Just leave all your UM gear by your curb and someone will come by to pick it up. Good riddance.

Obvious threads are obvious, but I still love them.