Search results

The teaching moment should be to coach Gurvan up and play Gurvan as much as possible and work through the kinks and build confidence against these ****** teams coming up. You ain’t teaching him **** by benching him for an inferior player.

That doesn’t change the fact that they completely bungled that decision despite watching practice for many months. Nor does it change the fact that the decision to start Campbell, arguably, cost us the UF game. On top of all that replacing Campbell in no way supports the idea that they’re...

Yep. And they thought Campbell was the best option at RT too. It’s not science. They mess up plenty.

It shouldn’t be. There’s plenty of blue-chip talent back there. Unfortunately, this secondary only seems to click with 4 year starters everywhere. That’s a recipe for disaster.

What has Knowles done to prove he should start? He’s been consistently bad for 87 years now. And he was awful against UNC no matter what the coaches feed to the media.

Safe for what? Knowles might know what to do, but he can’t do it.

What does Hall struggling have to do with knowles? Knowles is not a good player no matter how much public praise the coaches give him for hanging in there and not transferring. If they can’t coach Hall up into performing better than a below-average player it’s on them.

Don’t understand all this sudden Knowles hype. He was terrible against UNC.