Search results

They do get that worn out grouper face thing going over time.

Oddly, that’s less problematic for CIS these days.

But you guys are right though. Unfortunately, this group can’t be trusted to handle the differences in intent.

I’m not going to add to divisiveness or choose sides amongst those trying to get rid of it. I appreciate whoever helps out, whether they like each other or not. In this case I did a Reply Ban given the comments here but what Hoops did is what I’d like to see happen the future.

At some point it’s hoped that the board members can police it.

The question is now - have we reached a point where the P word can be used by members strictly in self-policing the board in response to a P rhymes with analytical statement, as is the case here?