Search results

Which has zero to do with the topic at hand. If you're basing potential on looking at the roster wouldn't you assume that a roster of three and four star kids would be better than a roster of two and three star kids?

Cheer up, it's irrelevant.

UCF at 21 kills any credibility that has. They struggle to recruit at a high level so how can you base future performance on kids that are't playing yet?